Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Courts of Queen's Bench and Exchequer Chamber in Ireland Volume 1; With Tables of the Names of the Cases (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1840 edition. Excerpt: ... the ultimate opinion of the learned counsel who directed the proofs, although his first impression was the other way; an impression which probably was the inducing motive to the defendant's attorney to procure this copy. Mr. Clancy's reasoning upon this subject has been assailed in strong terms as being illegal and illogical; I confess I cannot view it in that light; his reasoning appears to me to be quite sound, and his conclusion to follow justly from his premises. The defendant had, it appears, the printed copy of the evidence given by the plaintiff in his possession; from this printed copy he thought it not safe to make the statement in his pleas, but procured also the clerk's compared copy. Now neither of tiiese copies was legal evidence of the plaintiff's testimony; that, it is confessed, was to be found in the original manuscript notes revised and subscribed by the plaintiff himself; both copies (the printed and the manuscript) may have been inaccurate, though the probability is, that both were correct, both being taken from the same original, the one in manuscript, the other in print; and both being only of equal authority in law, that is, neither of them being admissible as evidence against the plaintiff. Mr. Clancy's offence is, that he thought, however prudent it might be for the defendants' counsel to see both when preparing the pleas, the party who had in his possession the printed copy should not be allowed, as against his adversary, the costs of the clerk's compared copy, even if the practice of the Court had allowed him to tax such expenses at all as between party and patty. I shall not particularize the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth changes; they are claims against the practice of the Court, and on that ground were...

R877

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8770
Mobicred@R82pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1840 edition. Excerpt: ... the ultimate opinion of the learned counsel who directed the proofs, although his first impression was the other way; an impression which probably was the inducing motive to the defendant's attorney to procure this copy. Mr. Clancy's reasoning upon this subject has been assailed in strong terms as being illegal and illogical; I confess I cannot view it in that light; his reasoning appears to me to be quite sound, and his conclusion to follow justly from his premises. The defendant had, it appears, the printed copy of the evidence given by the plaintiff in his possession; from this printed copy he thought it not safe to make the statement in his pleas, but procured also the clerk's compared copy. Now neither of tiiese copies was legal evidence of the plaintiff's testimony; that, it is confessed, was to be found in the original manuscript notes revised and subscribed by the plaintiff himself; both copies (the printed and the manuscript) may have been inaccurate, though the probability is, that both were correct, both being taken from the same original, the one in manuscript, the other in print; and both being only of equal authority in law, that is, neither of them being admissible as evidence against the plaintiff. Mr. Clancy's offence is, that he thought, however prudent it might be for the defendants' counsel to see both when preparing the pleas, the party who had in his possession the printed copy should not be allowed, as against his adversary, the costs of the clerk's compared copy, even if the practice of the Court had allowed him to tax such expenses at all as between party and patty. I shall not particularize the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth changes; they are claims against the practice of the Court, and on that ground were...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

October 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

October 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 11mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

214

ISBN-13

978-1-231-85531-7

Barcode

9781231855317

Categories

LSN

1-231-85531-2



Trending On Loot