The American and English Encyclopedia of Law Volume 25 (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1894 Excerpt: ... is an appeal from the decision of the city authorities. Cochran v. Collins, 29 Cal. 129; Emery v. Bradford, 29 Cal. 75. 4. See supra, this title, Constitutiona Iity--Notice. B. Stockton v. Creanor, 45 Cal. 643; St. Louis v. Richeson, 76 Mo. 470; Murdock v. Cincinnati, 44 Fed. Rep. 726. The sufficiency of the petition by property owners may not be called in question in such action, as that is a matter to be determined by the common council. Scranton v. Jermyn, 156 Pa. St. 107. 6. Fass v. Seehawer, 60 Wis. 525; Emery v. Bradford, 29 Cal. 75; Cochran v. Collins, 29 Cal. 130; Dixon v. Detroit, 86 Mich. 516; Motz v. Detroit, 18 Mich. 514; State v. Jersey City, 29 N. J. L. 441; Municipality No. 2 v. Guillotte, 14 La. Ann. 295; Ricketts z: Hyde Park. S5 111. no; Murray v. Tucker, 10 Bush (Ky.) 240; Henderson v. Lambert, 14 Bush (Ky.)24; Whitfield v. Hippie (Ky. 1S89), 12 S. W. Rep. 50. Where the contractor receives tax bills in payment for work, a substantial compliance with the contract is sufficient to warrant a recovery thereof, Pittsburgh v. McConnell, 130 Pa. St. 463; Erie v. Butler, 120 Pa. St. 374; Watson v. Philadelphia, 93 Pa. St. in; Harrisburg v. Baptist, 156 Pa. St. 526; but where there is no pretense that all the work provided for in the contract has been done, a city cannot, by accepting a portion of it, bind lot owners to the payment of assessments therefor. Henderson v. Lambert, 14 Bush (Ky.) 24. And where the work is not completed within the time specified, and the council refuses to extend the time, there can be no valid assessment made therefor, notwithstanding the contractor goes on and completes the job. Mappa v. Los Angeles, 61 Cal. 309. But it has been held that where the work was imperfectly done, a property owner sued on a special tax bil...

R2,091

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles20910
Mobicred@R196pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1894 Excerpt: ... is an appeal from the decision of the city authorities. Cochran v. Collins, 29 Cal. 129; Emery v. Bradford, 29 Cal. 75. 4. See supra, this title, Constitutiona Iity--Notice. B. Stockton v. Creanor, 45 Cal. 643; St. Louis v. Richeson, 76 Mo. 470; Murdock v. Cincinnati, 44 Fed. Rep. 726. The sufficiency of the petition by property owners may not be called in question in such action, as that is a matter to be determined by the common council. Scranton v. Jermyn, 156 Pa. St. 107. 6. Fass v. Seehawer, 60 Wis. 525; Emery v. Bradford, 29 Cal. 75; Cochran v. Collins, 29 Cal. 130; Dixon v. Detroit, 86 Mich. 516; Motz v. Detroit, 18 Mich. 514; State v. Jersey City, 29 N. J. L. 441; Municipality No. 2 v. Guillotte, 14 La. Ann. 295; Ricketts z: Hyde Park. S5 111. no; Murray v. Tucker, 10 Bush (Ky.) 240; Henderson v. Lambert, 14 Bush (Ky.)24; Whitfield v. Hippie (Ky. 1S89), 12 S. W. Rep. 50. Where the contractor receives tax bills in payment for work, a substantial compliance with the contract is sufficient to warrant a recovery thereof, Pittsburgh v. McConnell, 130 Pa. St. 463; Erie v. Butler, 120 Pa. St. 374; Watson v. Philadelphia, 93 Pa. St. in; Harrisburg v. Baptist, 156 Pa. St. 526; but where there is no pretense that all the work provided for in the contract has been done, a city cannot, by accepting a portion of it, bind lot owners to the payment of assessments therefor. Henderson v. Lambert, 14 Bush (Ky.) 24. And where the work is not completed within the time specified, and the council refuses to extend the time, there can be no valid assessment made therefor, notwithstanding the contractor goes on and completes the job. Mappa v. Los Angeles, 61 Cal. 309. But it has been held that where the work was imperfectly done, a property owner sued on a special tax bil...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

March 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

March 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 38mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

760

ISBN-13

978-1-130-04599-4

Barcode

9781130045994

Categories

LSN

1-130-04599-4



Trending On Loot