The Law of Promoters; A Treatise on the Law of Promoters of Private Corporations, Covering the Rights and Liabilities of Promoters, and Also the Rights and Liabilities of the Corporation and the Subscribers for and Purchasers of Its Shares, the Rights and Liab (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1916. Excerpt: ... 332. Liability of promoters of defectively organized corporation. Promoters who carry on business in the name of a defectively organized corporation may sometimes be held liable as partners for the debts contracted in the name of the company. The doctrine supported by the weight of authority is that persons who associate themselves to engage in business for profit under any name are liable as partners for the debts incurred in that name; that the limited liability of stockholders of corporations is an exception to the general rule, and that the stockholders come within that exception only if the company in whose name they carry on business is in fact a corporation.61 The associates need New Jersey.--Cottentin v. Meyer, 80 N. J. Law 52, 76 Atl. 341. New York.--Tuccillo v. Pittelli, 127 Supp. 314. Wisconsin Bergeron v. Hobbs, 96 Wis. 641, 71 N. W. 1056, 65 Am. St. Rep. 85. United Kingdom and Colonies Seiffert v. Irving, 15 Ont. Rep. 173; Gildersleeve v. Balfour, 15 Ont. Pr. Rep. 293. And see note to Empire Mills v. Alston Grocery Co., 12 L. R. A. 366. The intended incorporators of an abortive corporation not intended to be formed for profit, were held liable, not as co-partners, but on the theory of agency in Johnson v. Corser, 34 Minn. 355, 25 N. W. 799, and in Upton v. Corser, 34 Minn. 355, 25 N. W. 801. Some authorities seem to sustain a rule that one who has contracted with an abortive company as a corporation, will not, even though no de facto corporation ever existed, be allowed to deny the corporate exnot, to escape liability, prove the existence of a de jure corporation. The creditor cannot, if there is a corporation de facto. call its legal existence into question.62 If there be a law under which the corporation might be organized de jure, a...

R871

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8710
Mobicred@R82pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1916. Excerpt: ... 332. Liability of promoters of defectively organized corporation. Promoters who carry on business in the name of a defectively organized corporation may sometimes be held liable as partners for the debts contracted in the name of the company. The doctrine supported by the weight of authority is that persons who associate themselves to engage in business for profit under any name are liable as partners for the debts incurred in that name; that the limited liability of stockholders of corporations is an exception to the general rule, and that the stockholders come within that exception only if the company in whose name they carry on business is in fact a corporation.61 The associates need New Jersey.--Cottentin v. Meyer, 80 N. J. Law 52, 76 Atl. 341. New York.--Tuccillo v. Pittelli, 127 Supp. 314. Wisconsin Bergeron v. Hobbs, 96 Wis. 641, 71 N. W. 1056, 65 Am. St. Rep. 85. United Kingdom and Colonies Seiffert v. Irving, 15 Ont. Rep. 173; Gildersleeve v. Balfour, 15 Ont. Pr. Rep. 293. And see note to Empire Mills v. Alston Grocery Co., 12 L. R. A. 366. The intended incorporators of an abortive corporation not intended to be formed for profit, were held liable, not as co-partners, but on the theory of agency in Johnson v. Corser, 34 Minn. 355, 25 N. W. 799, and in Upton v. Corser, 34 Minn. 355, 25 N. W. 801. Some authorities seem to sustain a rule that one who has contracted with an abortive company as a corporation, will not, even though no de facto corporation ever existed, be allowed to deny the corporate exnot, to escape liability, prove the existence of a de jure corporation. The creditor cannot, if there is a corporation de facto. call its legal existence into question.62 If there be a law under which the corporation might be organized de jure, a...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 12mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

234

ISBN-13

978-1-150-62501-5

Barcode

9781150625015

Categories

LSN

1-150-62501-5



Trending On Loot