Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Volume 5; V. 87 ) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1863 Excerpt: ... Chase & another v. Allen. a parish. When the members of the Baptist society withdrew from the Chebacco parish, they voluntarily abandoned all the privileges, rights and advantages, spiritual and temporal, which had previously belonged to them as inhabitants of that parish. It was right that this should be so, as they left the residue of the parish to sustain, without their aid, all its burdens and obligations. The parish preserved its corporate identity, bound to oerform its contracts and to discharge its parochial duties. That legal identity still continues, and no law which is known to this court can take from it its property. Judgment for the tenant. Lucius C. Chase & another vs. Ira H. Allen. An answer, in an action of replevin, which avers that the defendant was and is the owner of the property replevied, and denies the plaintiff's right to maintain the action, puts in issue the plaintiff's title to the property. Replevin. The defendant in his answer averred "that at the time of the supposed taking and detention of the property mentioned in said writ, he the said defendant was the owner of said property and is now the lawful owner of the same, and he denies the right of the plaintiffs to maintain this action." At the trial in the superior court, before Brigham, J., the plaintiffs offered no evidence, but contended, and the judge ruled, that in the absence of evidence they were entitled to a verdict. The defendant called a witness who testified that at the time of the service of the writ the property was in the defendant's possession; and be contended that this was a good title, and proposed to submit the case to the jury. But the judge ruled that there was nothing for the jury, and directed a verdict for the plaintiffs, which was accordingly rendered. ...

R841

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8410
Mobicred@R79pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1863 Excerpt: ... Chase & another v. Allen. a parish. When the members of the Baptist society withdrew from the Chebacco parish, they voluntarily abandoned all the privileges, rights and advantages, spiritual and temporal, which had previously belonged to them as inhabitants of that parish. It was right that this should be so, as they left the residue of the parish to sustain, without their aid, all its burdens and obligations. The parish preserved its corporate identity, bound to oerform its contracts and to discharge its parochial duties. That legal identity still continues, and no law which is known to this court can take from it its property. Judgment for the tenant. Lucius C. Chase & another vs. Ira H. Allen. An answer, in an action of replevin, which avers that the defendant was and is the owner of the property replevied, and denies the plaintiff's right to maintain the action, puts in issue the plaintiff's title to the property. Replevin. The defendant in his answer averred "that at the time of the supposed taking and detention of the property mentioned in said writ, he the said defendant was the owner of said property and is now the lawful owner of the same, and he denies the right of the plaintiffs to maintain this action." At the trial in the superior court, before Brigham, J., the plaintiffs offered no evidence, but contended, and the judge ruled, that in the absence of evidence they were entitled to a verdict. The defendant called a witness who testified that at the time of the service of the writ the property was in the defendant's possession; and be contended that this was a good title, and proposed to submit the case to the jury. But the judge ruled that there was nothing for the jury, and directed a verdict for the plaintiffs, which was accordingly rendered. ...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 13mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

238

ISBN-13

978-1-235-78352-4

Barcode

9781235783524

Categories

LSN

1-235-78352-9



Trending On Loot