Atlantic Reporter; Cases Argued and Determined in the Courts of Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1914 Excerpt: ... ( 286)--Injuries To Servant--Negligence--Nonsuit. Where, in a freight handler's action for injuries, the evidence showed that the defendant railroad company permitted a hole, with a makeshift cover likely to be disarranged, to exist on its platform where men were constantly employed in loading freight, as n result of which plaintiff was injured, and there was no evidence that either plaintiff or bis coempioyfis were performing their work in an unusual or careless manner, or that they must have known of the defect or that plaintiff's danger was so obvious and imminent that he must have assumed the risk, it was error to grant a nonsuit. Ed. Note.--For other cases, sec Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. 10IH, 100(5. 1008, 10101015, 1017-1033, 1030-1042, 1044, 1046-1030: Dec. Dig. 286. 2. Limitation Of Actions ( 127)--PleadIng--Amendment--Proof. In a freight handler's action for injuries, refusal to restrict the proof to plaintiff's original declaration was not error, though the amendment thereto was made after the statute of limitations had run, where both the original and the amended declarations averred the existence of an improperly guarded hole as the specific negligence relied on, although the former recited a different state of facts which if proved might have shown contributory negligence, and where it appeared that plaintiff could not read and that the lawyer who drew the first declaration failed to state the case fully according to the facts detailed to him by plaintiff. Ed. Note.--For other cases, see Limitation of Actions, Cent Dig. 1 543-547; Dec. Dig. I 127. Appeal from Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County. Trespass by John Collins against the Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company for personal Injuries...

R831

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8310
Mobicred@R78pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1914 Excerpt: ... ( 286)--Injuries To Servant--Negligence--Nonsuit. Where, in a freight handler's action for injuries, the evidence showed that the defendant railroad company permitted a hole, with a makeshift cover likely to be disarranged, to exist on its platform where men were constantly employed in loading freight, as n result of which plaintiff was injured, and there was no evidence that either plaintiff or bis coempioyfis were performing their work in an unusual or careless manner, or that they must have known of the defect or that plaintiff's danger was so obvious and imminent that he must have assumed the risk, it was error to grant a nonsuit. Ed. Note.--For other cases, sec Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. 10IH, 100(5. 1008, 10101015, 1017-1033, 1030-1042, 1044, 1046-1030: Dec. Dig. 286. 2. Limitation Of Actions ( 127)--PleadIng--Amendment--Proof. In a freight handler's action for injuries, refusal to restrict the proof to plaintiff's original declaration was not error, though the amendment thereto was made after the statute of limitations had run, where both the original and the amended declarations averred the existence of an improperly guarded hole as the specific negligence relied on, although the former recited a different state of facts which if proved might have shown contributory negligence, and where it appeared that plaintiff could not read and that the lawyer who drew the first declaration failed to state the case fully according to the facts detailed to him by plaintiff. Ed. Note.--For other cases, see Limitation of Actions, Cent Dig. 1 543-547; Dec. Dig. I 127. Appeal from Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County. Trespass by John Collins against the Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company for personal Injuries...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

May 2014

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

May 2014

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 54mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

1084

ISBN-13

978-1-130-67983-0

Barcode

9781130679830

Categories

LSN

1-130-67983-7



Trending On Loot