A Review and Defence of Two Dissertations Concerning the Etymology and Scripture-Meaning of the Hebrew Words Elohim and Berith (Volume 2-3) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1755. Excerpt: ... Besides God's purifier should in all reason be understood of the Antitype, the Person typically represented by the calf. And so Mr Moody takes it/. 133. "Was "not every transgression, a transgressing a"gainst the Purifier, and the terms of his "Purification?" B u T Mr Moody should be asked here, whether to transgress against any person, be ever expressed by "ny used with that person, as it is here used with Berith? And the like question may be asked Mr Bate who takes another way of replying to mej p. 163. What sense shall we make o transgressing the Purifier?" Why passing him "by, and disregarding him. 13? is to "pass by or go beyond a thing. And this "is a phrase for contempt." B u T is it ever so used? The English phrases may be used in that sense: but I do not recollect that lay in Hebrew ever hath I 2 that But here he applies to "3y absolutely what can only be laid when it is used with ia. As in Gen. xv. where this Rite is first described, vtr. 17. DntJn l3 "13? And in this text inna ia rajn and mostly passed hetween the parts thereof, as our translators have rightly given it at the end of the verse. But the phrase now under consideration is rm anayn. that signification of passing by which implies contempt, though it hath another and contrary signification that implies pardon and forgiveness. His translation of the verse mp. 120. is this. "I will give the men who have ' transgressedI.my purification, which have "not performed the words of (or that "were spoke with) the purification which lc they slew before me the calf which they "cut in twain." &c Here I may repeat my former question in Dissertations, p. 115. How can a purification or the terms of a purification be said to be cut off? Or a purification (as Mr Bate now words it) be said to be s...

R354

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles3540
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1755. Excerpt: ... Besides God's purifier should in all reason be understood of the Antitype, the Person typically represented by the calf. And so Mr Moody takes it/. 133. "Was "not every transgression, a transgressing a"gainst the Purifier, and the terms of his "Purification?" B u T Mr Moody should be asked here, whether to transgress against any person, be ever expressed by "ny used with that person, as it is here used with Berith? And the like question may be asked Mr Bate who takes another way of replying to mej p. 163. What sense shall we make o transgressing the Purifier?" Why passing him "by, and disregarding him. 13? is to "pass by or go beyond a thing. And this "is a phrase for contempt." B u T is it ever so used? The English phrases may be used in that sense: but I do not recollect that lay in Hebrew ever hath I 2 that But here he applies to "3y absolutely what can only be laid when it is used with ia. As in Gen. xv. where this Rite is first described, vtr. 17. DntJn l3 "13? And in this text inna ia rajn and mostly passed hetween the parts thereof, as our translators have rightly given it at the end of the verse. But the phrase now under consideration is rm anayn. that signification of passing by which implies contempt, though it hath another and contrary signification that implies pardon and forgiveness. His translation of the verse mp. 120. is this. "I will give the men who have ' transgressedI.my purification, which have "not performed the words of (or that "were spoke with) the purification which lc they slew before me the calf which they "cut in twain." &c Here I may repeat my former question in Dissertations, p. 115. How can a purification or the terms of a purification be said to be cut off? Or a purification (as Mr Bate now words it) be said to be s...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 2mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

30

ISBN-13

978-1-235-75133-2

Barcode

9781235751332

Categories

LSN

1-235-75133-3



Trending On Loot