Reports of Cases Determined in the District Courts of Appeal of the State of California (Volume 11) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1910. Excerpt: ... CRIMINAL LAW (Continued). 14. Evidence--Impeachment Of Prosecuting Witness--ContradicTory Statements--Proper Foundation Essential.--In order that the prosecuting witness may be impeached by statements contradictory to his testimony, it is essential that the defendants' counsel must lay the proper foundation by calling the attention of the witness to the statements to be proved, and stating the circumstances of time, place and persons present. (People v. Hogan, 599.) 15. Identity or Statement Must Appear.--When the attention of the prosecuting witness is called to a statement, it is essential that the statement sought to be proved was the Bame statement to which the attention of the prosecuting witness was called. (Id.) 16. Offer or Impeaching Evidence--Inclusion Of Improper MatTer--Rejection Of Whole Offer Sustained.--Where an offer of impeaching evidence includes some matter to which the attention of the prosecuting witness was called, and other matter to which his attention was not called, the ruling of the court in rejecting the whole offer will be sustained. (Id.) 17. Offer Of Proof--Unsatisfactory Method Of Evidence.--An offer of proof, instead of calling the witness, is at best a very loose and unsatisfactory method of introducing evidence, and certainly when the offer consists of several propositions, this court must sustain the ruling rejecting it, if it is correct as to any one of the propositions offered. (Id.) 18. Appeal--Review Of Error In Excluding Evidence--Duty Of Appellant.--It is fundamental that a party relying upon the exclusion of evidence as constituting error upon which he asks to have the case reversed must clearly show and point out the offered evidence, and that it was competent and material. (Id.) 19. Abduction Of Girl For Prosti...

R1,112

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles11120
Mobicred@R104pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1910. Excerpt: ... CRIMINAL LAW (Continued). 14. Evidence--Impeachment Of Prosecuting Witness--ContradicTory Statements--Proper Foundation Essential.--In order that the prosecuting witness may be impeached by statements contradictory to his testimony, it is essential that the defendants' counsel must lay the proper foundation by calling the attention of the witness to the statements to be proved, and stating the circumstances of time, place and persons present. (People v. Hogan, 599.) 15. Identity or Statement Must Appear.--When the attention of the prosecuting witness is called to a statement, it is essential that the statement sought to be proved was the Bame statement to which the attention of the prosecuting witness was called. (Id.) 16. Offer or Impeaching Evidence--Inclusion Of Improper MatTer--Rejection Of Whole Offer Sustained.--Where an offer of impeaching evidence includes some matter to which the attention of the prosecuting witness was called, and other matter to which his attention was not called, the ruling of the court in rejecting the whole offer will be sustained. (Id.) 17. Offer Of Proof--Unsatisfactory Method Of Evidence.--An offer of proof, instead of calling the witness, is at best a very loose and unsatisfactory method of introducing evidence, and certainly when the offer consists of several propositions, this court must sustain the ruling rejecting it, if it is correct as to any one of the propositions offered. (Id.) 18. Appeal--Review Of Error In Excluding Evidence--Duty Of Appellant.--It is fundamental that a party relying upon the exclusion of evidence as constituting error upon which he asks to have the case reversed must clearly show and point out the offered evidence, and that it was competent and material. (Id.) 19. Abduction Of Girl For Prosti...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 19mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

350

ISBN-13

978-1-154-42179-8

Barcode

9781154421798

Categories

LSN

1-154-42179-1



Trending On Loot