United Kingdom Administrative Law - Human Rights ACT 1998, Judicial Review in English Law, Royal Prerogative, List of United Kingdom Tribunals (Paperback)

Chapters: Human Rights Act 1998, Judicial Review in English Law, Royal Prerogative, List of United Kingdom Tribunals, Tribunals in the United Kingdom, Compensation Act 2006, Carltona Doctrine, Associated Provincial Picture Houses V Wednesbury Corporation, Register of Architects, Anisminic V Foreign Compensation Commission, Legitimate Expectation, Better Regulation Commission, English Administrative Law, Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, Maladministration, Claims Management Services Regulator. Source: Wikipedia. Pages: 90. Not illustrated. Free updates online. Purchase includes a free trial membership in the publisher's book club where you can select from more than a million books without charge. Excerpt: substituted by SI 2004/1574, art 2(1). Date in force: 22 June 2004: see SI 2004/1574, art 1. Sub-s (4): words Secretary of State in square brackets substituted by SI 2003/1887, art 9, Sch 2, para 10(1). Date in force: 19 August 2003: see SI 2003/1887, art 1(2).The Human Rights Act 1998 is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which received Royal Assent on 9 November 1998, and mostly came into force on 2 October 2000. Its aim is to "give further effect" in UK law to the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act makes available in UK courts a remedy for breach of a Convention right, without the need to go to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg. It also totally abolished the death penalty in UK law (although this was not required by the Convention in force for the UK at that time). In particular, the Act makes it unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Convention, unless the wording of an Act of Parliament means they have no other choice. It also requires UK judges to take account of decisions of the Strasbourg court, and to interpret legislation, as far as possible, in a way which is compatible with the Convention. However, ...More: http: //booksllc.net/?id=63962