The American and English Encyclopedia of Law Volume 6 (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1898 Excerpt: ...In this case, however, the confession was inadmissible because made under undue influence. 2. Ancient English Statute Directing Preliminary Examination.--1 and 2 Philip and Mary, c. 13: 2 and 3 Philip and Mar)', c. 10; I Chitty Cr. L. 87. Authentication of Writing by Magistrate--Texas.--Under the Texas statute it has been held that unless the written voluntary statement containing the prisoner's confession was authenticated by the magistrate before whom it purported to have been made, it is inadmissible in evidence. Walker v. State, 28 Tex. App. 112; Guy v. State, 9 Tex. App. 161. Oregon.--Also under Hill's Anno. Laws Oregon, 1598, subd. 4, it has been held that a statement made by one accused of crime, on his preliminary examination, must be signed and certified to by the magistrate, so as to be admissible in evidence on a subsequent trial. State v. Hatcher, 29 Oregon 309. 3. Signature of Prisoner Not Essential.--1 Chitty Cr. L. 87; Rex v. Lambe, 2 Leach C. C. 552; Rex v. Thomas, 2 Leach C. C. 637; People v. Johnson, 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. (N. Y.) 193; Com. v. Boyer, 2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. (N. Y.) 150; People v. Robertson, 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. (N. Y.) 66; State v. Stoops, Add. (Pa.) 381. Compare Rex v. Pressly, 6 C. & P. 183, 25 E. C L. 345. But by Statute in Delaware it must appear that the written examination of the accused was approved and signed by him. State v. Harman, 3 Harr. (Del.) 567; State v. Brister, 1 Houst. Cr. Cas. (Del.) 150. Signature Refused by Prisoner.--Where the examination of a prisoner before a magistrate has been taken down in writing according to statute, and is read over to him, and he is told that he may sign it or not as he chooses, it has been held that if he declines to sign it, it will not be admissible in evidence against him a...

R827

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8270
Mobicred@R78pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1898 Excerpt: ...In this case, however, the confession was inadmissible because made under undue influence. 2. Ancient English Statute Directing Preliminary Examination.--1 and 2 Philip and Mary, c. 13: 2 and 3 Philip and Mar)', c. 10; I Chitty Cr. L. 87. Authentication of Writing by Magistrate--Texas.--Under the Texas statute it has been held that unless the written voluntary statement containing the prisoner's confession was authenticated by the magistrate before whom it purported to have been made, it is inadmissible in evidence. Walker v. State, 28 Tex. App. 112; Guy v. State, 9 Tex. App. 161. Oregon.--Also under Hill's Anno. Laws Oregon, 1598, subd. 4, it has been held that a statement made by one accused of crime, on his preliminary examination, must be signed and certified to by the magistrate, so as to be admissible in evidence on a subsequent trial. State v. Hatcher, 29 Oregon 309. 3. Signature of Prisoner Not Essential.--1 Chitty Cr. L. 87; Rex v. Lambe, 2 Leach C. C. 552; Rex v. Thomas, 2 Leach C. C. 637; People v. Johnson, 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. (N. Y.) 193; Com. v. Boyer, 2 Wheel. Cr. Cas. (N. Y.) 150; People v. Robertson, 1 Wheel. Cr. Cas. (N. Y.) 66; State v. Stoops, Add. (Pa.) 381. Compare Rex v. Pressly, 6 C. & P. 183, 25 E. C L. 345. But by Statute in Delaware it must appear that the written examination of the accused was approved and signed by him. State v. Harman, 3 Harr. (Del.) 567; State v. Brister, 1 Houst. Cr. Cas. (Del.) 150. Signature Refused by Prisoner.--Where the examination of a prisoner before a magistrate has been taken down in writing according to statute, and is read over to him, and he is told that he may sign it or not as he chooses, it has been held that if he declines to sign it, it will not be admissible in evidence against him a...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

May 2014

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

May 2014

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 53mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

1062

ISBN-13

978-1-235-89825-9

Barcode

9781235898259

Categories

LSN

1-235-89825-3



Trending On Loot