The History of English Law Before the Time of Edward I (Volume 1) (Paperback)


Book may have numerous typos, missing text, images, or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1898. Excerpt: ... specific precedents (exempla) may have been alleged in court1; in Edward I.'s day the pleaders are already citing and 'distinguishing' previous cases3; but as a general rule the judges, p. 163] assisted by clerks, who were on their way to become judges, would regard themselves as having an implicit knowledge of the consuetudo curiae and would not feel bound to argue about past cases. The justices of the bench would often be fully justified in behaving thus; many of them were expeiienced men who had worked their way upwards through all the ranks of the king's court and chancery. And so even the knights who were employed to take assizes in their shires, though they had read no law, would believe that they knew the law and custom applicable to the cases that came before them. Every man who does his duty knows a great deal of law and custom: the difficulty is to persuade him that he does not know everything2. The custom of the king's court is the custom of England, and becomes the common law. As to local customs, the king's justices will in general phrases express their respect for them4. We see no signs of any consciously conceived desire to root them out5. None the less, if they are not being destroyed, their further growth is checked. Especially in all matters of procedure, the king's court, which is now obtaining a thorough control over all other courts, is apt to treat its own as the only just rules2. A heavy burden of proof is cast upon those 1 Note Book, pi. 1213: the Earl of Chester appeals to cases concerning other palatine earls. Ibid. pi. 1227: in the exceedingly important case raising the qnestion whether a palatinate can be partitioned, the magnates reject foreign precedents; 'nec voluerunt iudicare per exempla usitata in partibua transmarinis.' In 1291 the Earl of Glouces...

R619

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles6190
Mobicred@R58pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

Book may have numerous typos, missing text, images, or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1898. Excerpt: ... specific precedents (exempla) may have been alleged in court1; in Edward I.'s day the pleaders are already citing and 'distinguishing' previous cases3; but as a general rule the judges, p. 163] assisted by clerks, who were on their way to become judges, would regard themselves as having an implicit knowledge of the consuetudo curiae and would not feel bound to argue about past cases. The justices of the bench would often be fully justified in behaving thus; many of them were expeiienced men who had worked their way upwards through all the ranks of the king's court and chancery. And so even the knights who were employed to take assizes in their shires, though they had read no law, would believe that they knew the law and custom applicable to the cases that came before them. Every man who does his duty knows a great deal of law and custom: the difficulty is to persuade him that he does not know everything2. The custom of the king's court is the custom of England, and becomes the common law. As to local customs, the king's justices will in general phrases express their respect for them4. We see no signs of any consciously conceived desire to root them out5. None the less, if they are not being destroyed, their further growth is checked. Especially in all matters of procedure, the king's court, which is now obtaining a thorough control over all other courts, is apt to treat its own as the only just rules2. A heavy burden of proof is cast upon those 1 Note Book, pi. 1213: the Earl of Chester appeals to cases concerning other palatine earls. Ibid. pi. 1227: in the exceedingly important case raising the qnestion whether a palatinate can be partitioned, the magnates reject foreign precedents; 'nec voluerunt iudicare per exempla usitata in partibua transmarinis.' In 1291 the Earl of Glouces...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 16mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

298

ISBN-13

978-1-150-29553-9

Barcode

9781150295539

Categories

LSN

1-150-29553-8



Trending On Loot