Michigan Reports (Volume 56); Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1886. Excerpt: ... James Harding V. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. Common carrier --Injury from being carried past station. A declaration as for injury to plaintiff in being wrongfully put off the train at a place remote from the railway station, will not support a recovery where the proof shows that the injuries suffered, which were very great, were mainly due to the passenger's being carried by, but finally landed near the station so late that the carriage which had called for him had gone again, the driver supposing that he bad not come, and when all places of shelter were closed, and all conveyances gone, it being after midnight, so that he was obliged, while suffering from fever, to walk home three-quarters of a mile in a freezing rain. Error to Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) April 16.--May 13. Case. Defendant brings error. Reversed. Edwards dk Stewart and E. W. Meddaugh for appellant. "Proof must follow allegations of pleadings, and the plaintiif can recover only on the grounds stated in his declaration: " Hutchinson on Carriers 793; Mayor v. Humphries 1 C. & P. 251; the impairment of plaintiffs health from spinal meningitis, did not proximately or naturally result from the said acts of negligence imputed to defendant, nor from any of them: Hutchinson on Carriers 773; Vicksburg cfe Meridian Railroad v. Ragsdale 46 Miss. 458; Griffin v. Colver 16 K Y. 4S9; Masterton v. Mayor of Brooklyn 7 Hill 61; Hadley v. Baxendale 9 Exch. 341; Olmstead v. Burke 25 11l. 86; 2 Pars, on Con. 458-461; M. C. It. R. Co. v. Burrows 33 Mich. 6; Lewis v. F. &. P. M. Ry. 54 Mich. 55. Howard & Roos for appellee, cited Pennsylvania Co. v. Hoagland 78 Ind. 203; Brown v. Chicago efce. R. R. Co. 54 Wis. 342; Williams v. Vanderbilt 28 N. Y. 217. Campbell, J. Plaintiff sued and obtained judg...

R877

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8770
Mobicred@R82pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1886. Excerpt: ... James Harding V. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. Common carrier --Injury from being carried past station. A declaration as for injury to plaintiff in being wrongfully put off the train at a place remote from the railway station, will not support a recovery where the proof shows that the injuries suffered, which were very great, were mainly due to the passenger's being carried by, but finally landed near the station so late that the carriage which had called for him had gone again, the driver supposing that he bad not come, and when all places of shelter were closed, and all conveyances gone, it being after midnight, so that he was obliged, while suffering from fever, to walk home three-quarters of a mile in a freezing rain. Error to Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) April 16.--May 13. Case. Defendant brings error. Reversed. Edwards dk Stewart and E. W. Meddaugh for appellant. "Proof must follow allegations of pleadings, and the plaintiif can recover only on the grounds stated in his declaration: " Hutchinson on Carriers 793; Mayor v. Humphries 1 C. & P. 251; the impairment of plaintiffs health from spinal meningitis, did not proximately or naturally result from the said acts of negligence imputed to defendant, nor from any of them: Hutchinson on Carriers 773; Vicksburg cfe Meridian Railroad v. Ragsdale 46 Miss. 458; Griffin v. Colver 16 K Y. 4S9; Masterton v. Mayor of Brooklyn 7 Hill 61; Hadley v. Baxendale 9 Exch. 341; Olmstead v. Burke 25 11l. 86; 2 Pars, on Con. 458-461; M. C. It. R. Co. v. Burrows 33 Mich. 6; Lewis v. F. &. P. M. Ry. 54 Mich. 55. Howard & Roos for appellee, cited Pennsylvania Co. v. Hoagland 78 Ind. 203; Brown v. Chicago efce. R. R. Co. 54 Wis. 342; Williams v. Vanderbilt 28 N. Y. 217. Campbell, J. Plaintiff sued and obtained judg...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 13mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

252

ISBN-13

978-1-154-17029-0

Barcode

9781154170290

Categories

LSN

1-154-17029-2



Trending On Loot