This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1912 Excerpt: ... Wailuku Sugar Co Cornwell v 513 Wailuku Sugar Co Cornwell v 585 Walker v Cornwell 457 Walsh v '.. Lawson 69 Ward Kekoav 565 Watson Kaneohe Ranch Co. v 658 Weber Kmmeluth & Co. v 180 Welsh Yon Hamm-Young Co. v... 598 Wilder v Hawaiian Trust Co 589 Wiley Kaneohe Ranch Co. v 658 Winkelbach v..: Honolulu Amusement Co... 498 Wong Leong Kaneohe Ranch Co. v 658 Wong Say Vpana v 399 Yamamoto v Sakurai 657 Yamamoto v Sakurai 678 Yamasaki Territory v 222 Yasuoka Territory v 344 Yau Lee Kaui v 690 Yee Yap Kahai v 192 Yim Chong Hon Kaneohe Ranch Co. v 658 Yim Hoy Kaneohe Ranch Co. v 658 Yim Tin Kong Kaneohe Ranch Co. v 658 Yonakidi Territory v 222 Yosihara..Territory v 222 Ziegler Campbell v.'5(i." Ziegler Campbell v 455 CASES DECIDED BY THE SUPREME COURT OK THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII TERRITORY OF HAWAII v. CHOY DAN. Reserved Question From Circuit court, First Circuit. Submitted January 31,1910. Decided February 2. 1910. Hartwell, C.J., Perry And De Bolt, JJ. Statutes--license to sell fish. Under Sec. 1418G., R. L. (Act 96, Laws of 1907), a license is required for the sale of fish at a fixed place of business. OPINION OF THE COURT BY PERRY, J. Defendant was charged with "having at Honolulu, City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, during one month last past, prior to and including August 30th, A. D. 1909, unlawfully and wilfully engaged in carrying on a certain business, to wit, a merchandise business, by selling fresh fish at those certain stalls numbers 11, 12 and 13 in the Honolulu Market in said City and County of Honolulu, without first obtaining a license for the carrying on of such business, he, the said Choy Dan, not being then and there a peddler of fish, fresh fruit or vegetables, contrary to the statute in such case made and proTerritory v. Choy Dan, 2...