An Analytical Digest of the Reports of Cases Decided in the Courts of Common Law, and Equity, of Appeal, and Nisi Prius (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1851 Excerpt: ...& K. (n. P.) 728. 4. To render a deposition taken before the Master under a judge's order, admissible on the ground of the witness being abroad, evidence must be given to satisfy the judge of the witness being out of the jurisdiction of the Court. Varicas v. French, 2 Car. & K. (n. P.) 1009. 5. A judge at chambers cannot grant a writ in the nature of a mandamus, or commission, to examine witnesses in India or the Colonies, under 13 Geo. 3, c. 63, s. 44, & 1 Will. 4, c. 22. Clarke v. East India Company, 6 Dowl. & L. (p. c.) 278. 6. An order for examination under interrogatories will not usually be granted before issue joined; and was refused before plea pleaded, although witness was very ill and might die in the mean time. Clutterbuck v. Jones, 6 Dowl. & L. (p. c.) 251. 7. A commission was granted without imposing terms, to enable defendant to examine witnesses, although the affidavit did not show that the evidence would be admissible, and the witnesses lived some distance off, and great delay would be occasioned. Dye v. Bennett, 1 L. M. & P. (p. c.) 92. 8. The ordinary form of the commission, under 1 Will. 4, c. 22, will not be departed from, without special grounds. Follett v. Delany, 7 Man. Gr. & Sc. (c. p.) 775. C Action Against. In case for not obeying a subpama, the declaration alleging that the plaintiff had a good cause of action; one of the pleas (the eighth) traversed that fact; the plaintiff had a verdict on all the issues except the eighth: held, that he was entitled to judgment non obstante veredicto on that issue, and that there was no need of a repleader; and that, in such an action, the plaintiff must show that he has sustained damage from the non-attendance of the defendant; and that, where there are several issue...

R644

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles6440
Mobicred@R60pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1851 Excerpt: ...& K. (n. P.) 728. 4. To render a deposition taken before the Master under a judge's order, admissible on the ground of the witness being abroad, evidence must be given to satisfy the judge of the witness being out of the jurisdiction of the Court. Varicas v. French, 2 Car. & K. (n. P.) 1009. 5. A judge at chambers cannot grant a writ in the nature of a mandamus, or commission, to examine witnesses in India or the Colonies, under 13 Geo. 3, c. 63, s. 44, & 1 Will. 4, c. 22. Clarke v. East India Company, 6 Dowl. & L. (p. c.) 278. 6. An order for examination under interrogatories will not usually be granted before issue joined; and was refused before plea pleaded, although witness was very ill and might die in the mean time. Clutterbuck v. Jones, 6 Dowl. & L. (p. c.) 251. 7. A commission was granted without imposing terms, to enable defendant to examine witnesses, although the affidavit did not show that the evidence would be admissible, and the witnesses lived some distance off, and great delay would be occasioned. Dye v. Bennett, 1 L. M. & P. (p. c.) 92. 8. The ordinary form of the commission, under 1 Will. 4, c. 22, will not be departed from, without special grounds. Follett v. Delany, 7 Man. Gr. & Sc. (c. p.) 775. C Action Against. In case for not obeying a subpama, the declaration alleging that the plaintiff had a good cause of action; one of the pleas (the eighth) traversed that fact; the plaintiff had a verdict on all the issues except the eighth: held, that he was entitled to judgment non obstante veredicto on that issue, and that there was no need of a repleader; and that, in such an action, the plaintiff must show that he has sustained damage from the non-attendance of the defendant; and that, where there are several issue...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

March 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

March 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 8mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

156

ISBN-13

978-1-130-05749-2

Barcode

9781130057492

Categories

LSN

1-130-05749-6



Trending On Loot