Lowell Hydraulic Experiments; Being a Selection from Experiments on Hydraulic Motors, on the Flow of Water Over Weirs, in Open Canals of Uniform Rectangular Section, and Through Submerged Orifices and Diverging Tubes, Made at Lowell, (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1909 edition. Excerpt: ...the proportional differences are nearly constant, and that the quantities by the proposed formula are too small by a little more than two per cent. If the coefficient of the proposed formula was changed from 3.33 to 3.41, the computed results would agree very nearly. It should be recollected that the constants in the proposed formula have been determined from experiments in which the depths upon the weir were from 0.6 to 1.6 feet, or about eight times the depths in the experiments by Poncelet and Lesbros. It is the general result of all the precise experiments on the discharge through openings of a variety of forms, in a thin plate, that, for very small heads, the coefficients require to be increased; which proves that the law of the discharge varying as the square root of the head, does not hold good for very small heads. The comparison in table XIV. affords the same indications; and the constancy of the proportional differences, indicates that the correction of the length, to compensate for the effect of the end contraction, is practically correct, both for large and small depths upon the weir. It would not be difficult so to determine the values of the constants in the formula Q=C(l--lnh)h', as to represent the experiments both of Poncelet and Lesbros and the Lower Locks experiments with nearly the same degree of exactness that the latter are represented, with the constants that have been adopted. This would undoubtedly be an advantage in some particular cases in practice, but if it was intended to make the formula general, the sacrifice of simplicity would be more than an equivalent disadvantage. 162. Comparison of the proposed formula with the results obtained by Castel. An abstract of these experiments may be found in the Annales de...

R462

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles4620
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1909 edition. Excerpt: ...the proportional differences are nearly constant, and that the quantities by the proposed formula are too small by a little more than two per cent. If the coefficient of the proposed formula was changed from 3.33 to 3.41, the computed results would agree very nearly. It should be recollected that the constants in the proposed formula have been determined from experiments in which the depths upon the weir were from 0.6 to 1.6 feet, or about eight times the depths in the experiments by Poncelet and Lesbros. It is the general result of all the precise experiments on the discharge through openings of a variety of forms, in a thin plate, that, for very small heads, the coefficients require to be increased; which proves that the law of the discharge varying as the square root of the head, does not hold good for very small heads. The comparison in table XIV. affords the same indications; and the constancy of the proportional differences, indicates that the correction of the length, to compensate for the effect of the end contraction, is practically correct, both for large and small depths upon the weir. It would not be difficult so to determine the values of the constants in the formula Q=C(l--lnh)h', as to represent the experiments both of Poncelet and Lesbros and the Lower Locks experiments with nearly the same degree of exactness that the latter are represented, with the constants that have been adopted. This would undoubtedly be an advantage in some particular cases in practice, but if it was intended to make the formula general, the sacrifice of simplicity would be more than an equivalent disadvantage. 162. Comparison of the proposed formula with the results obtained by Castel. An abstract of these experiments may be found in the Annales de...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

September 2013

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

September 2013

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 5mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

92

ISBN-13

978-1-130-67770-6

Barcode

9781130677706

Categories

LSN

1-130-67770-2



Trending On Loot