New Criminal Procedure Volume 2; Or, New Commentaries on the Law of Pleading and Evidence and the Practice in Criminal Cases (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: ... formed and expressed an opinion," or be under prejudice or bias. Noe v. S., 4 How. Miss. 330, 332. Each case so depends on its circumstances as to exclude any absolute rule. But in general terms, one is incompetent who would require evidence to annul an opinion formed. Sam v. S., 13 Sm. 6 M. 189. Fugltt v. S., 82 Miss. 189, 35 So. 942. Even though from rumor, it disqualifies if evidence is required to remove it. Alfred v. S., 37 Miss. 296; Ogle v. S., 33 Miss. 383. And see White v. S., 52 Miss. 216; Lee v. S., 45 Miss. 114. An opinion from rumor does not disqualify if it is not fixed, and no testimony would be required to remove it; but one derived from hearing the witnesses on a former trial disqualifies, even though the juror should claim that he is unbiased and it would not influence his verdict. Logan v. S., 50 Miss. 269. Evans v. S., 87 Miss. 459, 40 So. 8. A juror found to have formed an opinion may be set aside before either party has had the opportunity to challenge him. Marsh v. S., 30 Miss. 627. And see Sam v. S., 31 Miss. 480. One who has expressed an opinion may be a juror If he swears that he can do justice notwithstanding his prior impressions. Parker v. S., 55 Miss. 414; Whitehead v. S., 97 Miss. 537, 52 So. 259; light expression of opinion. Missouri. Though by statute one is disqualified who "has formed or delivered an opinion on the issue, or any material fact to be tried," still an opinion from mere rumor, if it does not create prejudice or bias, will not exclude him. Baldwin v. S., 12 Mo. 223; S. v. Wilson, 85 Mo. 134; S. v. Reed, 89 Mo. 168, 1 S. W. 225; S. v. Cunningham, 100 Mo. 382, 12 S. W. 376. And see Stoner v. S., 4 Mo. 368; S. v. Martin, 28 Mo. 350; S. v. Davis, 29 Mo. 391; S. v. Ross, 29 Mo. 32; S. v. Rose, 32 Mo....

R674

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles6740
Mobicred@R63pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: ... formed and expressed an opinion," or be under prejudice or bias. Noe v. S., 4 How. Miss. 330, 332. Each case so depends on its circumstances as to exclude any absolute rule. But in general terms, one is incompetent who would require evidence to annul an opinion formed. Sam v. S., 13 Sm. 6 M. 189. Fugltt v. S., 82 Miss. 189, 35 So. 942. Even though from rumor, it disqualifies if evidence is required to remove it. Alfred v. S., 37 Miss. 296; Ogle v. S., 33 Miss. 383. And see White v. S., 52 Miss. 216; Lee v. S., 45 Miss. 114. An opinion from rumor does not disqualify if it is not fixed, and no testimony would be required to remove it; but one derived from hearing the witnesses on a former trial disqualifies, even though the juror should claim that he is unbiased and it would not influence his verdict. Logan v. S., 50 Miss. 269. Evans v. S., 87 Miss. 459, 40 So. 8. A juror found to have formed an opinion may be set aside before either party has had the opportunity to challenge him. Marsh v. S., 30 Miss. 627. And see Sam v. S., 31 Miss. 480. One who has expressed an opinion may be a juror If he swears that he can do justice notwithstanding his prior impressions. Parker v. S., 55 Miss. 414; Whitehead v. S., 97 Miss. 537, 52 So. 259; light expression of opinion. Missouri. Though by statute one is disqualified who "has formed or delivered an opinion on the issue, or any material fact to be tried," still an opinion from mere rumor, if it does not create prejudice or bias, will not exclude him. Baldwin v. S., 12 Mo. 223; S. v. Wilson, 85 Mo. 134; S. v. Reed, 89 Mo. 168, 1 S. W. 225; S. v. Cunningham, 100 Mo. 382, 12 S. W. 376. And see Stoner v. S., 4 Mo. 368; S. v. Martin, 28 Mo. 350; S. v. Davis, 29 Mo. 391; S. v. Ross, 29 Mo. 32; S. v. Rose, 32 Mo....

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

March 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

March 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 9mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

168

ISBN-13

978-1-130-75493-3

Barcode

9781130754933

Categories

LSN

1-130-75493-6



Trending On Loot