The American Decisions (Volume 29); Containing All the Cases of General Value and Authority Decided in the Courts of the Several States, from the Earliest Issue of the State Reports to the Year 1869 (Paperback)


Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: running back to the stable wall mentioned in the deed, and shown in the diagram. In 1827, the administrator of John Litle conveyed to Sharp, the defendant, all the lot conveyed by Morris to Litle, except the lot conveyed by the latter to Smock, as above mentioned. This deed conveyed the premises, subject to the right of way mentioned in the deed, to Smock, above referred to, and " to all the covenants made by the said John Litle to the said Robert Smock." Since October, 1828, the defendant has passed on foot and led a horse, without the leave of the plaintiff, through the four-and-a-half foot alley, and on through a continuation thereof, indicated on the diagram by a dotted line, to and through the stable wall, through which he made an opening into the stable. The question submitted to the court is, whether, in point of law, the defendant has, by reason of the premises, interfered with or obstructed the said alley, or the use or enjoyment thereof, by the plaintiff, as he was entitled to use and enjoy the same. Gadwalader and Ghauncey, for the plaintiff. Read and Bouvier, for the defendant. By Court, Gibson G. J. The sum of the few authorities which bear on the point before us, is given in Cruise's Digest, tit. 24, sec. 15, where it is said that the use of a way must be according to the grant or the occasion of it, and not exceed it: Bo that a right of way over another's ground to a particular place will not justify the use of it to go beyond that place. For this is cited Bowel v. King, 1 Mod. 190, and Lawton v. Ward, 1 Ld. Baym. 75, which bear a considerable resemblance to the present case. In the former of them, A., having a right of way over B.'s ground to Blackacre, drove his cattle not only to Blackacre, but to a place beyond it; and it was argued, that when they were a...

R1,074

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles10740
Mobicred@R101pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: running back to the stable wall mentioned in the deed, and shown in the diagram. In 1827, the administrator of John Litle conveyed to Sharp, the defendant, all the lot conveyed by Morris to Litle, except the lot conveyed by the latter to Smock, as above mentioned. This deed conveyed the premises, subject to the right of way mentioned in the deed, to Smock, above referred to, and " to all the covenants made by the said John Litle to the said Robert Smock." Since October, 1828, the defendant has passed on foot and led a horse, without the leave of the plaintiff, through the four-and-a-half foot alley, and on through a continuation thereof, indicated on the diagram by a dotted line, to and through the stable wall, through which he made an opening into the stable. The question submitted to the court is, whether, in point of law, the defendant has, by reason of the premises, interfered with or obstructed the said alley, or the use or enjoyment thereof, by the plaintiff, as he was entitled to use and enjoy the same. Gadwalader and Ghauncey, for the plaintiff. Read and Bouvier, for the defendant. By Court, Gibson G. J. The sum of the few authorities which bear on the point before us, is given in Cruise's Digest, tit. 24, sec. 15, where it is said that the use of a way must be according to the grant or the occasion of it, and not exceed it: Bo that a right of way over another's ground to a particular place will not justify the use of it to go beyond that place. For this is cited Bowel v. King, 1 Mod. 190, and Lawton v. Ward, 1 Ld. Baym. 75, which bear a considerable resemblance to the present case. In the former of them, A., having a right of way over B.'s ground to Blackacre, drove his cattle not only to Blackacre, but to a place beyond it; and it was argued, that when they were a...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 18mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

334

ISBN-13

978-0-217-94718-3

Barcode

9780217947183

Categories

LSN

0-217-94718-2



Trending On Loot