Who is a true prophet? Who has real access to divine realms of
knowledge? Early Christian communities accused each other's
prophets of madness and of making false claims to divine knowledge.
This book argues that early Christians did not seek to answer
questions about true prophecy or to define madness and rationality,
but rather used this discourse in order to control knowledge, to
establish their own authority, and to define Christian identity.
Christians launched these arguments in the context of the
Greco-Roman world, where prophecy, visions, ecstasy, and
dreams--all considered part of the same phenomenon--were the
subject of cutting-edge philosophical, medical, and even political
Early Christian prophecy has usually been interpreted according
to a model which explains that at its origins, Christianity was
characterized by vibrant spiritual gifts which declined as church
order and institutions developed. Arguing that a model of struggle
informed by feminist theory and postcolonial criticism provides a
better framework for understanding early Christian texts, this work
clarifies how early Christian arguments about rationality, madness,
and the role of spiritual gifts in history are attempts to
negotiate authority and to define religious identity in the midst
of many competing forms of Christianity. Laura Nasrallah uses New
Testament and early third-century texts to trace the rhetoric of
this debate--rhetoric that is still alive today as communities
across the globe struggle to define religious identity.
Is the information for this product incomplete, wrong or inappropriate?
Let us know about it.
Does this product have an incorrect or missing image?
Send us a new image.
Is this product missing categories?
Add more categories.
Review This Product
No reviews yet - be the first to create one!