Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court And, at Law, in the Court of Errors and Appeals of the State of New Jersey (Volume 43) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1882. Excerpt: ... t Feder v. Ilerrick. until the persons claiming to be next of kin have obtained a decree of the proper tribunal, establishing their title, aseertaining the amount due them respectively, and shall tender to him a refunding bond for the sum 'allotted' to them respectively." With respect to the suggestion that if a bond has not been tendered such fact can be set up by a plea in abatement, the sufficient answer is, that such a course would be entirely irregular. The use of this plea on such an occasion would be utterly abnormal. Such a plea is never appropriate when the plaintiff's case is imperfectly made out in the declaration; for such an imperfection a demurrer affords the only mode of exception. These are first principles of pleading, and it is not necessary to call in authorities to vouch for them. In regard to the cases cited by the counsel of the defendant in his brief, viz., Cowell v. Oxford, 1 Halst. 432, and ExWs of Henry ads. Lilley, 1 Butcher 302, it will be found upon looking into them that they were suits for the non-payment of legacies, and that they were decided on a peculiar expression to be found in the statute regulating that procedure, and they, therefore, are not applicable to the matter now in hand. Those decisions establish a mere matter of practice, and however open their grounds may be to criticism, after this lapse of time they are not to be disturbed, but they have no present bearing. The demurrer is sustained. MORRIS FEDER & CO. v. CARLETON M. HERRICK. 1. On demurrer to a declaration for libel the words must be construed in the sense imputed to them by the plaintiff. 2. Words having a tendency to bring a person into ridicule, hatred or contempt are actionable if written or published. 3. Caution against imputing in the pleading a m...

R853

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8530
Mobicred@R80pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1882. Excerpt: ... t Feder v. Ilerrick. until the persons claiming to be next of kin have obtained a decree of the proper tribunal, establishing their title, aseertaining the amount due them respectively, and shall tender to him a refunding bond for the sum 'allotted' to them respectively." With respect to the suggestion that if a bond has not been tendered such fact can be set up by a plea in abatement, the sufficient answer is, that such a course would be entirely irregular. The use of this plea on such an occasion would be utterly abnormal. Such a plea is never appropriate when the plaintiff's case is imperfectly made out in the declaration; for such an imperfection a demurrer affords the only mode of exception. These are first principles of pleading, and it is not necessary to call in authorities to vouch for them. In regard to the cases cited by the counsel of the defendant in his brief, viz., Cowell v. Oxford, 1 Halst. 432, and ExWs of Henry ads. Lilley, 1 Butcher 302, it will be found upon looking into them that they were suits for the non-payment of legacies, and that they were decided on a peculiar expression to be found in the statute regulating that procedure, and they, therefore, are not applicable to the matter now in hand. Those decisions establish a mere matter of practice, and however open their grounds may be to criticism, after this lapse of time they are not to be disturbed, but they have no present bearing. The demurrer is sustained. MORRIS FEDER & CO. v. CARLETON M. HERRICK. 1. On demurrer to a declaration for libel the words must be construed in the sense imputed to them by the plaintiff. 2. Words having a tendency to bring a person into ridicule, hatred or contempt are actionable if written or published. 3. Caution against imputing in the pleading a m...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 13mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

242

ISBN-13

978-1-235-69130-0

Barcode

9781235691300

Categories

LSN

1-235-69130-6



Trending On Loot