This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1603 Excerpt: ...An-. Jj gellsjCome Angell receyue him that is Genii uerted from his former errors, Sec. 20. But I would haue the Magdeburgiamor any of their parteners, shew me, when, or where this sentence of Origen was euer noted or condemned by antiquity for error or hereiie, as some other doctrines of his were. Certaine it is, they can not. Which is a singular argument against them.For that those watchmen of the Church, that noted and condemned those other errors of his, would haue noted also this, if it had ben taken for an error in those dayes. And further I fay to About the Uagdeburgim, lett them tell vs, whether hono-other holy fathers (yea the chiefest"of Gods rmge & church) after Origen did not hould the very lion of fame doctrine? Sure I am that the MagdeburAngells.MW themsclues in the very next century after, 'docondemnebyname SaintEpbremfic Saint Hilary for this doctrine of inuocation of AnofAngclls in the some sense, that Origen did hold yt. And then againe, in the some third CenU % century they do reprehend by name for in-tMt' uocation of other Saints (which is the some controuersie) the grauest Doctors of the Church: to wittf, Stmt Athdtufm, SAintBafiB, S. Gregory Naxiamjen, S. Ambrose, S. Eptfbtniiu Efbrtm and Prudcntm, cytinee their plaine words, and condemningc their doctrine in this behalfe. So as yf this were an hereiie, all these fathers were heretiks. Which were a blasphemous cogitation to thinke: & much more to ipeake or vtter: & thus much of the first obiection about honouringe Angells & other saints, wherin Protestants do only calumniate our doings, as yow iee. IU As for the CollyridUns, he that will read SamtEfifhrnttu, who wrytethof thatmadd l ). foud fantaiticall error of certayne women ktr'ep...