Christian Apologetics - Problem of Evil, the Rage Against God, Presuppositional Apologetics, List of Christian Apologetic Works (Paperback)

Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online. Pages: 37. Chapters: Problem of evil, The Rage Against God, Presuppositional apologetics, List of Christian apologetic works, Testimony of the Evangelists, Trilemma, De Viris Illustribus, Biblical Research Institute, Magis Institute, Power for Living, First Apology of Justin Martyr, Criterion of embarrassment, Fulcran Vigouroux, The Everlasting Man, Epistle to Diognetus, Stand To Reason, Hugh F. Blunt, Elenctics, Atheist Delusions, The Reason for God, Christian Evidence Society, Ecumenical Apologetics, Bible and Spade, Beside Still Waters, De Carne Christi, Babylon Mystery Religion, Christian Advocate, De Arte Cabbalistica, Apology Against Rufinus. Excerpt: In the philosophy of religion, the problem of evil is the question of how to explain evil if there exists a deity that is omnibenevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient (see theism). Some philosophers have claimed that the existences of such a god and of evil are logically incompatible or unlikely. Attempts to resolve the question under these contexts have historically been one of the prime concerns of theodicy. Some responses include the arguments that true free will cannot exist without the possibility of evil, that humans cannot understand God, that suffering is necessary for spiritual growth or evil is the consequence of a fallen world. Others contend that God is not omnibenevolent. There are also many discussions of "evil" and associated "problems" in other philosophical fields, such as secular ethics, and scientific disciplines such as evolutionary ethics. But as usually understood, the "problem of evil" is posed in a theological context. Numerous different versions of the problem of evil have been formulated. One example among many of a formulation of the problem of evil is often attributed to Epicurus and may be schematized as follows: This argument is of the logically valid form...