New York Term Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of That State Volume 2 (Paperback)

,
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1814 edition. Excerpt: ...of lot No. 12. to which it is admitted the lessor of the plaintiff has, title. It is immaterial in what manner this line was ascertained, whether by a joint submission to one or more surveyors, or by an ex parte survey: it is enough that Kloclc, after it had been ascertained, recognised it as the true line. This would preclude him from denying the plaintiff s right, and must also have the same effect as respects the claim of the defendant, who holds under Klock. The defendant, however, sets up a subsequent agreement made between himself and the lessor of the plaintiff, which he contends is to do away the acts and acknowledgments of Kloclc. This agreement, as stated in the case, I do not think can in any way affect the plaintit f s right. If it is to have the operation of rescinding or waiving any right previously acquired, it was to have that effect on condition that a certain cause then depending, between John J. Klock and George Wills, should terminate in favour of the latter, and it was incumbent on the defendant to show that that suit had terminated favourably to W ills, ' nothing, however, appears to show how that cause had been decided, or whether opinion, it was incumbent on the plaintiff to have shown that the nnwronx, rmwronx, any decision had taken place. The plaintiff had shown enough N" M to entitle him to recover, and if any thing had occurred to take dies, or their agents. away that right, it was incumbent on the defendant to show it. And besides, this second agreement is not free from difliculty, on the ground of the statute of frauds. The title to the premises is acknowledged to be in the lessor of the plaintiff, and if the second agreement is to have any operation, it is to...

R382

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles3820
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1814 edition. Excerpt: ...of lot No. 12. to which it is admitted the lessor of the plaintiff has, title. It is immaterial in what manner this line was ascertained, whether by a joint submission to one or more surveyors, or by an ex parte survey: it is enough that Kloclc, after it had been ascertained, recognised it as the true line. This would preclude him from denying the plaintiff s right, and must also have the same effect as respects the claim of the defendant, who holds under Klock. The defendant, however, sets up a subsequent agreement made between himself and the lessor of the plaintiff, which he contends is to do away the acts and acknowledgments of Kloclc. This agreement, as stated in the case, I do not think can in any way affect the plaintit f s right. If it is to have the operation of rescinding or waiving any right previously acquired, it was to have that effect on condition that a certain cause then depending, between John J. Klock and George Wills, should terminate in favour of the latter, and it was incumbent on the defendant to show that that suit had terminated favourably to W ills, ' nothing, however, appears to show how that cause had been decided, or whether opinion, it was incumbent on the plaintiff to have shown that the nnwronx, rmwronx, any decision had taken place. The plaintiff had shown enough N" M to entitle him to recover, and if any thing had occurred to take dies, or their agents. away that right, it was incumbent on the defendant to show it. And besides, this second agreement is not free from difliculty, on the ground of the statute of frauds. The title to the premises is acknowledged to be in the lessor of the plaintiff, and if the second agreement is to have any operation, it is to...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

2013

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

2013

Authors

,

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 10mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

178

ISBN-13

978-1-234-20241-5

Barcode

9781234202415

Categories

LSN

1-234-20241-7



Trending On Loot