Wisconsin Reports (Volume 78); Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Wisconsin (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos, missing text or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1891. Not illustrated. Excerpt: ... Browning and others vs. The Goodrich Transportation Co. the horses, and in fact all the circumstances, in order to intelligently determine what kind of speed would be careless or reckless driving, or what want of care in keeping a lookout, or want of vigilance in stopping the car in the presence of reasonably apprehended danger, would be negligence. The car moved and the child moved, and the circumstances necessarily kept shifting and changing as they approached each other, and hence the case was peculiarly for the jury. The special findings must necessarily be considered and construed with reference to such shifting and changing circumstances. So considered and construed, we must hold that the negligence found in the first finding is not wholly eliminated by any or all the other special findings. This ruling is not, as we understand, in conflict with any of the adjudications of this court. While we may differ with the learned counsel for the defendant as to the significance of some of those cases, yet our principal difference here is as to the construction and effect of the special findings in the case at bar. By the Court.-- The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Browning and others, Respondents, vs. The Goodeioh Transportation Company, Appellant. December S-- December 16, 1890. Carriers; Contracts Limiting Liability, (l, 2) Failure to deliver: Burden of proof: Negligence. (S) Contract inuring to benefit ofconnecting carriers: New contract by them. (4) Evidence: Immaterial error. 1. A carrier received goods under a contract relieving it from liability "for the dangers of navigation, fire, collision, or delivery, except to land goods on dock or pier." In an action to recover the value of the goods, it appearing that they were never delivered to the cons...

R863

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8630
Mobicred@R81pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos, missing text or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1891. Not illustrated. Excerpt: ... Browning and others vs. The Goodrich Transportation Co. the horses, and in fact all the circumstances, in order to intelligently determine what kind of speed would be careless or reckless driving, or what want of care in keeping a lookout, or want of vigilance in stopping the car in the presence of reasonably apprehended danger, would be negligence. The car moved and the child moved, and the circumstances necessarily kept shifting and changing as they approached each other, and hence the case was peculiarly for the jury. The special findings must necessarily be considered and construed with reference to such shifting and changing circumstances. So considered and construed, we must hold that the negligence found in the first finding is not wholly eliminated by any or all the other special findings. This ruling is not, as we understand, in conflict with any of the adjudications of this court. While we may differ with the learned counsel for the defendant as to the significance of some of those cases, yet our principal difference here is as to the construction and effect of the special findings in the case at bar. By the Court.-- The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Browning and others, Respondents, vs. The Goodeioh Transportation Company, Appellant. December S-- December 16, 1890. Carriers; Contracts Limiting Liability, (l, 2) Failure to deliver: Burden of proof: Negligence. (S) Contract inuring to benefit ofconnecting carriers: New contract by them. (4) Evidence: Immaterial error. 1. A carrier received goods under a contract relieving it from liability "for the dangers of navigation, fire, collision, or delivery, except to land goods on dock or pier." In an action to recover the value of the goods, it appearing that they were never delivered to the cons...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 13mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

246

ISBN-13

978-1-154-41800-2

Barcode

9781154418002

Categories

LSN

1-154-41800-6



Trending On Loot