This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1906 edition. Excerpt: ... acted at their peril. In locating the terminal yards the defendants stood on the footing of an individual, and were entitled to no superior rights of immunity by legislative authority. The authority to construct the yards did not authorize defendants to place them wherever they might think pro Terminal Co. v. Lellyett. per in the city, without reference to the property rights of others. Defendants have no right to use the yards in disregard of the rights of others, and with immunity for their invasion. "If you find from the evidence that the terminal yards are located in or adjacent to a residence neighborhood, and that in their operation the defendants make noises which, because of their volume, character, proximity, or unreasonableness, cause plaintifl: ' material distress, discomfort, or injury, then, in that case, the defendants are liable. It is no defense that such noises are necessary to the operation of defendants' business, its location, manner in which it is conducted, the hours of its operation, character and volume of the noises, reasonableness or unreasonableness of the hours during which such noises are made, and all other attendant circumstances. "I further charge you and instruct you, gentlemen, that neither is it any defense that when the nuisance was established it was in a convenient place, and that the public had come to the nuisance either by the extension of the town or the operating of highways and streets. "The fact that the business was originally established in a convenient place, but that the public has come to it, is no defense." The legislature may authorize public corporations and quasi public corporations to take private property for public use. Terminal Co. v. Lellyett....