The Pacific Reporter Volume 120 (Paperback)

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912 Excerpt: ...property, as alimony, but had authority to decree alimony in a continuous allotment of sums, payable at regular intervals. Ed. Note.--For other cases, see Divorce, Cent. Dig. 679, 680; Dec. Dig. $ 241. 3. Divorce ( 241)--Alimony--Allotment. In a suit for divorce, filed prior to statehood, and wherein plaintiff was awarded-a divorce and alimony, and the order decreeing alimony provided that defendant should pay plaintiff "the sum of $1,000, payable as follows, $20 on the 15th day of each and every succeeding month, until the sum of $1,000 is paid in full," held, that this order provided for the payment of alimony "in a countinuous allotment of sums, payable at regular intervals," and was within the authority of the court. Ed. Note.--For other cases, see Divorce, Cent. Dig. 679, 680; Dec. Dig. 241. Commissioners' Opinion, Division No. 2. Error from District Court, McClaln County: R. McMillan, Judge. Action by L. C. Adams against John C. Adams. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed. J. W. Hocker, for plaintiff in error. J. F. Sharp, for defendant in error. BREWER, C. This was a suit for divorce, filed on the 30th day of January, 1907, in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, sitting at Purcell. It was pending at the time of statehood, and was thereafter tried in the district court of the county of McClain on the 13th day of February, 1909. The court found generally for the defendant in error, L. C. Adams, plaintiff below, who will be hereafter called plaintiff, and against plaintiff in error, John C. Adams, defendant below, who will hereafter be called defendant. The plaintiff In her complaint alleged, by proper averments, the following ground under...