The New York Code of Civil Procedure Volume 1; As It Is January 1, 1905, with Notes of the Judicial Decisions Thereon or Relating Thereto Together with the Judiciary Article of the Constitution, Statutory Construction Law, Rules of the Court of Appeals, G (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912 Excerpt: ...the fact that the defense was being conducted by an insurance company: Haigh v. Edelmeyer & Morgan Hod Elevator Co., 123 App. Div. 376; 107 N. Y. Supp. 936. p. if counsel persists in calling the attention of the jury to the fact that defendant was indemnified by a bond, the trial court, if requested, should withdraw a juror and order a retrial, for otherwise the appellate division will reverse the judgment: Kelsey v. City of New York, 123 App. Div. 381; 107 N. Y. Supp. 1089. q. Rule of road.--it is proper to charge that the rule or custom of the road is to pass to the left on overtaking and to the right on meeting a vehicle, if the position of the parties be such as to bring the rule into operation: Peters v. Cuneo, 123 App. Div. 740; 108 N. Y. Supp. 264. r. Specific.--An exception that counsel ' wished to except to the modification of the charge and to the charging of the request made by" the plaintiff's counsel, is not sufficiently specific: Clark v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.. 191 N. Y. 416; rev'g 115 App. Div. 813; 101 N. Y. Supp. 96. a. Where a charge, as to the obligation of a defendant to promuigate rules, is so general that it may have related to a warning, which should have been given to employees, an exception to the charge should specifically call the attention of the court to the defect claimed: Chinn v. Ferro-Concrete Construction Co., 148 App. Div. 368. 997. Case, when necessary; how made and settled. b. Arguments.--Arguments of counsel over the admissibllty of evidence have no place in a case on appeal when everything necessary to show the objection and the grounds thereof, the ruling of the court and the exception thereto otherwise appears: Davidson v. New York City Railway Co., 122 App. Div. 11; 106 N. Y. Supp. 1044. c. ...

R1,179

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles11790
Mobicred@R110pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1912 Excerpt: ...the fact that the defense was being conducted by an insurance company: Haigh v. Edelmeyer & Morgan Hod Elevator Co., 123 App. Div. 376; 107 N. Y. Supp. 936. p. if counsel persists in calling the attention of the jury to the fact that defendant was indemnified by a bond, the trial court, if requested, should withdraw a juror and order a retrial, for otherwise the appellate division will reverse the judgment: Kelsey v. City of New York, 123 App. Div. 381; 107 N. Y. Supp. 1089. q. Rule of road.--it is proper to charge that the rule or custom of the road is to pass to the left on overtaking and to the right on meeting a vehicle, if the position of the parties be such as to bring the rule into operation: Peters v. Cuneo, 123 App. Div. 740; 108 N. Y. Supp. 264. r. Specific.--An exception that counsel ' wished to except to the modification of the charge and to the charging of the request made by" the plaintiff's counsel, is not sufficiently specific: Clark v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.. 191 N. Y. 416; rev'g 115 App. Div. 813; 101 N. Y. Supp. 96. a. Where a charge, as to the obligation of a defendant to promuigate rules, is so general that it may have related to a warning, which should have been given to employees, an exception to the charge should specifically call the attention of the court to the defect claimed: Chinn v. Ferro-Concrete Construction Co., 148 App. Div. 368. 997. Case, when necessary; how made and settled. b. Arguments.--Arguments of counsel over the admissibllty of evidence have no place in a case on appeal when everything necessary to show the objection and the grounds thereof, the ruling of the court and the exception thereto otherwise appears: Davidson v. New York City Railway Co., 122 App. Div. 11; 106 N. Y. Supp. 1044. c. ...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

March 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

March 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 20mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

370

ISBN-13

978-1-130-88054-0

Barcode

9781130880540

Categories

LSN

1-130-88054-0



Trending On Loot