The Personalisation of Politics - A Study of Parliamentary Democracies (Paperback, New)


With the weakening of the structural determinants of politics in Western democracies, it is commonly assumed that individual politicians and politicians as individuals have come to mean more for voter behaviour and party choice. Many observers argue that politics has become more personalized in the course of the last few decades. Although considerable research on the various aspects of personalization has been carried out, no single study so far has approached the question from a broad comparative perspective. By examining four central dimensions of personalization -- institutions, candidates, party leaders and media -- and by including data from most stable parliamentary democracies, this book attempts to fill part of that gap.

Karvonen demonstrates clearly that there is no linear trend towards more personalization among the cases studied. From the point of view of the general personalization thesis, the findings are mixed at best; in some important respects, they are negative. While the media tend to focus more on individual politicians, the idea that party leaders increasingly determine the party choice of voters finds little support in empirical evidence. Most researchers seem to agree that the position of the prime minister has become more dominant. A closer look at comparative evidence results in a more complex picture. There has been a certain tendency to develop the most party-centred electoral systems in a more candidate-centred direction. On the other hand, recent reforms have altered some of the most candidate-centred systems in the opposite direction. Individual candidates seem to mean more to voters in systems where preferential voting has been practiced for a long time. This change is by no means dramatic, nor does it seem to apply to other electoral systems. Karvonen shows that the personalisation thesis, while not completely erroneous, has been overstated not just by the media but in some of the research literature as well.


R1,100

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles11000
Mobicred@R103pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceShips in 10 - 15 working days


Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

With the weakening of the structural determinants of politics in Western democracies, it is commonly assumed that individual politicians and politicians as individuals have come to mean more for voter behaviour and party choice. Many observers argue that politics has become more personalized in the course of the last few decades. Although considerable research on the various aspects of personalization has been carried out, no single study so far has approached the question from a broad comparative perspective. By examining four central dimensions of personalization -- institutions, candidates, party leaders and media -- and by including data from most stable parliamentary democracies, this book attempts to fill part of that gap.

Karvonen demonstrates clearly that there is no linear trend towards more personalization among the cases studied. From the point of view of the general personalization thesis, the findings are mixed at best; in some important respects, they are negative. While the media tend to focus more on individual politicians, the idea that party leaders increasingly determine the party choice of voters finds little support in empirical evidence. Most researchers seem to agree that the position of the prime minister has become more dominant. A closer look at comparative evidence results in a more complex picture. There has been a certain tendency to develop the most party-centred electoral systems in a more candidate-centred direction. On the other hand, recent reforms have altered some of the most candidate-centred systems in the opposite direction. Individual candidates seem to mean more to voters in systems where preferential voting has been practiced for a long time. This change is by no means dramatic, nor does it seem to apply to other electoral systems. Karvonen shows that the personalisation thesis, while not completely erroneous, has been overstated not just by the media but in some of the research literature as well.

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

ECPR Press

Country of origin

United Kingdom

Release date

February 2010

Availability

Expected to ship within 10 - 15 working days

First published

2012

Authors

Dimensions

238 x 164 x 8mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback

Pages

132

Edition

New

ISBN-13

978-1-907301-03-2

Barcode

9781907301032

Categories

LSN

1-907301-03-8



Trending On Loot