A Practical Treatise of the Law of Evidence (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos, missing text or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1860. Not illustrated. Excerpt: ... But it must appear that such declaration or entry was against the interest of the party making it, in order to be admissible; and if it do not so appear it will be rejected. Thus, in Reg. v. Inhabitants of Worth, h an entry by a deceased master in a book in which he was in the habit of entering the hirings of his servants, which was as follows: "April 4th, 1824. W. Worrell came, and to have for the half-year, 40s. Sept. 29. Paid this 2. Oct. 39 Came*again DEGREES and to have Is. per week to March 25th, 1825, is twenty-one weeks, two days, 1 Is. 6d. 25th. Paid this;" was tendered in evidence to prove the hiring in a settlement case, but was held inadmissible, on the ground that as it merely showed a contract which must be supposed to be made on equitable terms, the entry was not against the interest of the master. The declarations of deceased tenants have in many instances been admitted in evidence, on matters connected with their tenancies, principally, as it seems, upon the ground that their declarations were made against their own interest. through A. B., upon whose death he became entitled to a particular portion of his personal property as a heriot. And see Coide v. Braham, 3 Ex. 183.--A. had taken the goods of B. in execution, and the sheriff having executed a bill of sale to him, B. was permitted to remain in possession, and the sheriff afterwards took the same goods in execution at the suit of another creditor of B. In an action by A. against the sheriff for the goods, it was held, that the declarations of B. as to the property of the goods, and that A.'s execution was merely colourable, were admissible for the sheriff; Willies v. Farley, 3 C. & P. 395; E. C. L. R. 14; and see Prosser v. Gwillim, 1 C. & K. 95; E. C. L. R. 47; Gully v. Bishop of Exete...

R1,233

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles12330
Mobicred@R116pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos, missing text or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1860. Not illustrated. Excerpt: ... But it must appear that such declaration or entry was against the interest of the party making it, in order to be admissible; and if it do not so appear it will be rejected. Thus, in Reg. v. Inhabitants of Worth, h an entry by a deceased master in a book in which he was in the habit of entering the hirings of his servants, which was as follows: "April 4th, 1824. W. Worrell came, and to have for the half-year, 40s. Sept. 29. Paid this 2. Oct. 39 Came*again DEGREES and to have Is. per week to March 25th, 1825, is twenty-one weeks, two days, 1 Is. 6d. 25th. Paid this;" was tendered in evidence to prove the hiring in a settlement case, but was held inadmissible, on the ground that as it merely showed a contract which must be supposed to be made on equitable terms, the entry was not against the interest of the master. The declarations of deceased tenants have in many instances been admitted in evidence, on matters connected with their tenancies, principally, as it seems, upon the ground that their declarations were made against their own interest. through A. B., upon whose death he became entitled to a particular portion of his personal property as a heriot. And see Coide v. Braham, 3 Ex. 183.--A. had taken the goods of B. in execution, and the sheriff having executed a bill of sale to him, B. was permitted to remain in possession, and the sheriff afterwards took the same goods in execution at the suit of another creditor of B. In an action by A. against the sheriff for the goods, it was held, that the declarations of B. as to the property of the goods, and that A.'s execution was merely colourable, were admissible for the sheriff; Willies v. Farley, 3 C. & P. 395; E. C. L. R. 14; and see Prosser v. Gwillim, 1 C. & K. 95; E. C. L. R. 47; Gully v. Bishop of Exete...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 21mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

392

ISBN-13

978-1-151-22812-3

Barcode

9781151228123

Categories

LSN

1-151-22812-5



Trending On Loot