Cases Argued and Determined in the Circuit and District Courts of the United States, for the Seventh Judicial Circuit (Volume 3) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1874. Excerpt: ... In re Skelley. of, the federal courts cannot take jurisdiction of it, except as is provided in the 25th section. Other objections to this court taking jurisdiction of the matter were also urged by the defendants; but as this point geems to me conclusive, I have not thought proper to allude to them. Application denied. On the dismissal of the bill by the Superior Court, the complainant.sued out a writ of error from the Supreme Court, and the cause was submitted at the September term, 1873, and is now pending. For numerous authorities on this question of removal from state courts, consult also, Akerly -. Vilat, Vol. 2 of this Series, 110; Same ease, post p. 832; Kingsbury vs. Kingsbury, ante, p.60. Reporter. In re SKELLEY. District Colrt--Northern District Of Illinois--, march, 1871. In Bankruptcy. 1. No Jurisdiction If Amount Reduced Below That Specified In The Act.--The District Court has no jurisdiction of an involuntary case in bankruptcy, unless it appears on the trial that the debtor, at that time, owes debts provable under the act exceeding the sum of three hundred dollars, and is indebted to the petitioning creditors in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars. This is true even though the debtor, at the time of the filing of the petition, was indebted to exceed those sums. When his indebtedness, by subsequent payments, is reduced below thosr suras, the court loses jurisdiction. 2. Debtor May Disprove All Material Allegations.--The latter clause of the forty-first section of the act was intended to allow the debtor to disprove on the trial all the material allegations of the petition. In re Skelley. 3. Payments--Proof Allowed On General Denial.--Payments made by the debtor to the petitioning creditors are material facts on the issue on denial..

R740

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles7400
Mobicred@R69pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1874. Excerpt: ... In re Skelley. of, the federal courts cannot take jurisdiction of it, except as is provided in the 25th section. Other objections to this court taking jurisdiction of the matter were also urged by the defendants; but as this point geems to me conclusive, I have not thought proper to allude to them. Application denied. On the dismissal of the bill by the Superior Court, the complainant.sued out a writ of error from the Supreme Court, and the cause was submitted at the September term, 1873, and is now pending. For numerous authorities on this question of removal from state courts, consult also, Akerly -. Vilat, Vol. 2 of this Series, 110; Same ease, post p. 832; Kingsbury vs. Kingsbury, ante, p.60. Reporter. In re SKELLEY. District Colrt--Northern District Of Illinois--, march, 1871. In Bankruptcy. 1. No Jurisdiction If Amount Reduced Below That Specified In The Act.--The District Court has no jurisdiction of an involuntary case in bankruptcy, unless it appears on the trial that the debtor, at that time, owes debts provable under the act exceeding the sum of three hundred dollars, and is indebted to the petitioning creditors in the amount of two hundred and fifty dollars. This is true even though the debtor, at the time of the filing of the petition, was indebted to exceed those sums. When his indebtedness, by subsequent payments, is reduced below thosr suras, the court loses jurisdiction. 2. Debtor May Disprove All Material Allegations.--The latter clause of the forty-first section of the act was intended to allow the debtor to disprove on the trial all the material allegations of the petition. In re Skelley. 3. Payments--Proof Allowed On General Denial.--Payments made by the debtor to the petitioning creditors are material facts on the issue on denial..

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 10mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

190

ISBN-13

978-1-150-14203-1

Barcode

9781150142031

Categories

LSN

1-150-14203-0



Trending On Loot