Report of Cases Argued and Determined in the Court of Appeals of Alabama Volume 6 (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1913 Excerpt: ... No counsel marked for either party. Per curiam. Appeal dismissed. CREWS V. THE STATE. (Decided January 23, 1912.) Appeal from Dale Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie. No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Per curiam. Appeal dismissed. CRITTENDEN V. THE STATE. (Decided January 23, 1913.) Appeal from Dale Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie. No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Per curiam. Appeal dismissed. DAVIS V. THE STATE. (Decided January 23, 1913.) Appeal from Dale Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie. No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Per curiam. Appeal dismissed. ELMORE LUMBER COMPANY V. NIXON. (Decided December 17, 1912.) Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson. Frank W. Lull, for appellant. J. M. Holly, for ap-pellec. Per curiam. Affirmed on the authority of Tice v. The State, 3 Ala. App. 164; 57 South. 506. SUBJECT INDEX ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL. Abatement and Revival; Other Action Pending.--Since the pen-alty prescribed by sections 5904 and 5910, Code 1907, cannot be recov-ered in a common law action for damages for failure to levy an attachment, the pendency of an action for damages against the sheriff for a failure to levy an attachment will not abate a summary pro-ceeding for judgment on motion for the statutory penalty.--Higdon, et. al. v. Fields, 281. ACCOUNTS. 1. Stated. Accounts Stated; How Determined; Prior Indebtedness.--An account stated presupposes the existence of an account, and the relation of debtor and creditor b...

R813

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8130
Mobicred@R76pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1913 Excerpt: ... No counsel marked for either party. Per curiam. Appeal dismissed. CREWS V. THE STATE. (Decided January 23, 1912.) Appeal from Dale Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie. No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Per curiam. Appeal dismissed. CRITTENDEN V. THE STATE. (Decided January 23, 1913.) Appeal from Dale Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie. No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Per curiam. Appeal dismissed. DAVIS V. THE STATE. (Decided January 23, 1913.) Appeal from Dale Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. Mike Sollie. No counsel marked for appellant. R. C. Brickell, Attorney General, and W. L. Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Per curiam. Appeal dismissed. ELMORE LUMBER COMPANY V. NIXON. (Decided December 17, 1912.) Appeal from Elmore Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Pearson. Frank W. Lull, for appellant. J. M. Holly, for ap-pellec. Per curiam. Affirmed on the authority of Tice v. The State, 3 Ala. App. 164; 57 South. 506. SUBJECT INDEX ABATEMENT AND REVIVAL. Abatement and Revival; Other Action Pending.--Since the pen-alty prescribed by sections 5904 and 5910, Code 1907, cannot be recov-ered in a common law action for damages for failure to levy an attachment, the pendency of an action for damages against the sheriff for a failure to levy an attachment will not abate a summary pro-ceeding for judgment on motion for the statutory penalty.--Higdon, et. al. v. Fields, 281. ACCOUNTS. 1. Stated. Accounts Stated; How Determined; Prior Indebtedness.--An account stated presupposes the existence of an account, and the relation of debtor and creditor b...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 12mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

220

ISBN-13

978-1-154-01073-2

Barcode

9781154010732

Categories

LSN

1-154-01073-2



Trending On Loot