Report of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama (58) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1920 edition. Excerpt: ... Cus. 1915B, #3. 84, and cases cited. 2 It never was the purpose of the act of Congress to make the initial carrier liable for loss or damage sustained or incurred upon any line handling the shipment other than the connecting carrier or carriers handling the shipment en route between the point of origin of shipment and the point of destination. When the shipment. as here, arrived in New Orleans at the terminal of the Louisville & Nashville, and was there ready for delivery, this was a fulfillment of the obligations undertaken and assumed by the defendant under its bills of lading, and it cannot be held responsible for any loss or damage that may have occurred to the cattle after they were delivered by the Louisville & Nashville, to the Louisiana Southern for transportation to the conslgnee's place of business. The liability of the defendant cannot be extended beyond the contract evidenced by the bill of lading; that is, to deliver the shipments of cattle at New Orleans. ParkerBell L. Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co., (39 Wash. 123, 124 Pac. 389, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 106-1; Internat. Agri. Corp. v. So. Ry. Co., 188 Ala. 354, 66 South. 14. 3 Nor-_ can the liability of the defendant be extended so as to cover any loss or damage to the cattle.while being transported over the line of the Louisiana Southern by any custom or course of dealing between the consignee and the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. And certainly this is true where there is no proof, as here, _that the defendant, .when it accepted the cattle for transportation, knew of such custom or course of dealing between the consignee and the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. Melbourne & Troy v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 88 Ala. 443, 6 South. 762. The...

R1,854

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles18540
Mobicred@R174pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1920 edition. Excerpt: ... Cus. 1915B, #3. 84, and cases cited. 2 It never was the purpose of the act of Congress to make the initial carrier liable for loss or damage sustained or incurred upon any line handling the shipment other than the connecting carrier or carriers handling the shipment en route between the point of origin of shipment and the point of destination. When the shipment. as here, arrived in New Orleans at the terminal of the Louisville & Nashville, and was there ready for delivery, this was a fulfillment of the obligations undertaken and assumed by the defendant under its bills of lading, and it cannot be held responsible for any loss or damage that may have occurred to the cattle after they were delivered by the Louisville & Nashville, to the Louisiana Southern for transportation to the conslgnee's place of business. The liability of the defendant cannot be extended beyond the contract evidenced by the bill of lading; that is, to deliver the shipments of cattle at New Orleans. ParkerBell L. Co. v. Great Northern Ry. Co., (39 Wash. 123, 124 Pac. 389, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 106-1; Internat. Agri. Corp. v. So. Ry. Co., 188 Ala. 354, 66 South. 14. 3 Nor-_ can the liability of the defendant be extended so as to cover any loss or damage to the cattle.while being transported over the line of the Louisiana Southern by any custom or course of dealing between the consignee and the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. And certainly this is true where there is no proof, as here, _that the defendant, .when it accepted the cattle for transportation, knew of such custom or course of dealing between the consignee and the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. Melbourne & Troy v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 88 Ala. 443, 6 South. 762. The...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

April 2013

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

April 2013

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 33mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

634

ISBN-13

978-1-151-87157-2

Barcode

9781151871572

Categories

LSN

1-151-87157-5



Trending On Loot