Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of Alabama (Volume 93) (Paperback)


Book may have numerous typos, missing text, images, or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1892. Excerpt: ... McTighe & Co. v. McLane.] JLsll McTig'he & Co. v. McLaue. Action jor Breach of Contract for Work and Labor. 1. Remedies for breach of contract; former retvrery.--For a breach of contract by the employer in failing to furnish scrapers for use in the construction of a railroad bed, whereby the cost of removing dirt would be lessened, the contractor may treat the contract as ended, and recover damages for the breach; or he may complete the work without the scrapers, and recover its value on a quantum meruit; but, if he recovers on a quantnm mcruit, or on an account stated after the completion of the work, he can not afterwards maintain an action for damages on account of the failure to furnish scrapers. Appeal from the City Court of Selma. Tried before the Hon. Jona. Haralson. G. A. Robbins, for appellant, cited Freeman on Judgments, 288; Duchess of Kingstonu Case, 2 Smith's L. C. 609 (573); 1 Greenl. Ev. j; 528-9; Chamberlain v. Ga'Mard, 26 Ala. 504; Gilbreath v. Jones, 66 Ala. 129; Mc Call v. Jones, 72 Ala. 3(58; Haas v. Taylor, 80 Ala. 459; Robinson v. Bullock, 66 Ala. 548; Strauss v. Meertief, 64 Ala. 299; Dicks v. Beltsher, 80 Ala. 369. Petws & Pettus, contra, cited S. c& N. Ala. RaiIroad Co. v. Heulein, 56 Ala. 368; Foster v. Napier, 73 Ala. 595; O'Neal v. Brown, 21 Ala. 482; 1 Brick. Digest, 26, 89; 3 Ib. 25, 42-3. COLEMAN, J.--The present suit was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract, the breach consisting in the failure to deliver six scrapers. The defendant pleaded in bar a former recovery. The court gave the general charge for the defendant, and the giving of this charge is the only assignment of error. To sustain his plea, the defendant offered in evidence the entire proceedings of the attachment suit mentioned in t...

R1,094

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles10940
Mobicred@R103pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

Book may have numerous typos, missing text, images, or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1892. Excerpt: ... McTighe & Co. v. McLane.] JLsll McTig'he & Co. v. McLaue. Action jor Breach of Contract for Work and Labor. 1. Remedies for breach of contract; former retvrery.--For a breach of contract by the employer in failing to furnish scrapers for use in the construction of a railroad bed, whereby the cost of removing dirt would be lessened, the contractor may treat the contract as ended, and recover damages for the breach; or he may complete the work without the scrapers, and recover its value on a quantum meruit; but, if he recovers on a quantnm mcruit, or on an account stated after the completion of the work, he can not afterwards maintain an action for damages on account of the failure to furnish scrapers. Appeal from the City Court of Selma. Tried before the Hon. Jona. Haralson. G. A. Robbins, for appellant, cited Freeman on Judgments, 288; Duchess of Kingstonu Case, 2 Smith's L. C. 609 (573); 1 Greenl. Ev. j; 528-9; Chamberlain v. Ga'Mard, 26 Ala. 504; Gilbreath v. Jones, 66 Ala. 129; Mc Call v. Jones, 72 Ala. 3(58; Haas v. Taylor, 80 Ala. 459; Robinson v. Bullock, 66 Ala. 548; Strauss v. Meertief, 64 Ala. 299; Dicks v. Beltsher, 80 Ala. 369. Petws & Pettus, contra, cited S. c& N. Ala. RaiIroad Co. v. Heulein, 56 Ala. 368; Foster v. Napier, 73 Ala. 595; O'Neal v. Brown, 21 Ala. 482; 1 Brick. Digest, 26, 89; 3 Ib. 25, 42-3. COLEMAN, J.--The present suit was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract, the breach consisting in the failure to deliver six scrapers. The defendant pleaded in bar a former recovery. The court gave the general charge for the defendant, and the giving of this charge is the only assignment of error. To sustain his plea, the defendant offered in evidence the entire proceedings of the attachment suit mentioned in t...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 18mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

334

ISBN-13

978-1-153-83574-9

Barcode

9781153835749

Categories

LSN

1-153-83574-6



Trending On Loot