Martin's Mining Cases of British Columbia Volume 2, PT. 1; With Statutes (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1905 Excerpt: ... together it takes very little evidence to shew that they have become co-partners as well as co-owners. Decision of Henderson, Co.j., affirmed on this point. Appeal by defendant from a judgment of Henderson, Co.J., statement, delivered on October 5th, 1903, in an action tried at Atlin in the mining jurisdiction of the County Court, on September 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8, respecting certain placer mining operations in the years 1901, 190 and 1903, on Pine Creek. The case is reported only on the point of a mining partnership which His Honour found existed between the plaintiff and defendant Blunck. The appeal came on for hearing at Vancouver before the Full Court, consisting of Hunter, C.J., Martin and Duff, JJ., on 28th April, 1904. J. D. Taylor, for the appellant: The operations began in 1901 Argument, between three co-owners, Scott, Harrigan and the plaintiff; and it is for the defendants who allege it to prove that these co-owners became partners, and the evidence here does not justify such finding. (The learned counsel here reviews the evidence.) A. L. Belyea, K.C., for the respondent: The three placer claims in question were grouped together for the purpose of working them by leave of the Gold Commissioner, and the evidence shews that whatever these parties may have been at the beginning of their relation, the status of co-owners as between Sabin and Blunck was altered to that of co-partners as well as co-owners at the time of the matters complained of. Per Curiam: --The learned Judge was right in finding that there was a co-partnership between these two persons to work these claims. It takes very little for working co-owners to drift into the position of co-partners. Appeal dismissed on this point. Judgment. Note.--For other cases on mining partnerships: s..

R571

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles5710
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1905 Excerpt: ... together it takes very little evidence to shew that they have become co-partners as well as co-owners. Decision of Henderson, Co.j., affirmed on this point. Appeal by defendant from a judgment of Henderson, Co.J., statement, delivered on October 5th, 1903, in an action tried at Atlin in the mining jurisdiction of the County Court, on September 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8, respecting certain placer mining operations in the years 1901, 190 and 1903, on Pine Creek. The case is reported only on the point of a mining partnership which His Honour found existed between the plaintiff and defendant Blunck. The appeal came on for hearing at Vancouver before the Full Court, consisting of Hunter, C.J., Martin and Duff, JJ., on 28th April, 1904. J. D. Taylor, for the appellant: The operations began in 1901 Argument, between three co-owners, Scott, Harrigan and the plaintiff; and it is for the defendants who allege it to prove that these co-owners became partners, and the evidence here does not justify such finding. (The learned counsel here reviews the evidence.) A. L. Belyea, K.C., for the respondent: The three placer claims in question were grouped together for the purpose of working them by leave of the Gold Commissioner, and the evidence shews that whatever these parties may have been at the beginning of their relation, the status of co-owners as between Sabin and Blunck was altered to that of co-partners as well as co-owners at the time of the matters complained of. Per Curiam: --The learned Judge was right in finding that there was a co-partnership between these two persons to work these claims. It takes very little for working co-owners to drift into the position of co-partners. Appeal dismissed on this point. Judgment. Note.--For other cases on mining partnerships: s..

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

March 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

March 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 7mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

124

ISBN-13

978-1-130-67055-4

Barcode

9781130670554

Categories

LSN

1-130-67055-4



Trending On Loot