Questions and Answers on Law; Alphabetically Arranged. with References to the Most Approved Authorities Volume 8 (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1852 edition. Excerpt: ... the agreement and intention of the parties.--6 Johns. Chan., 395; 4 Whart., 410; 8 Watts, 148; Pitman on Prin. and Surely, 40 Law Lib., 93. Here the assignment was made in pursuance of the original design of the parties, and was the consideration for the payment of the money. Per Curiam.--The plaintiflySmith, stands in the place of Neill, the mortgagee; and why shall he not have the same remedy? Because, says the defendant's counsel, the condition of the mortgage was to save harmless Neill, and not Smith, his assignee, who paid the original debt; and it consequently has not been broken. But the payment of the debt for which Neill was surety was in effect his payment, and not the payment of Smith, who furnished the money at his request, and on the security of the mortgage. Had Neill received this money in the first instance, raised as it was on the security of the mortgage, and paid it in extinction of the original debt with his own hand, there would not be a doubt that the contingency had happened to his disadvantage, against which the mortgage was a security; and it happened in effect, when Smith paid it with the consideration of the assignment. The money which constituted that consideration was Neill's money; and the payment was his. That is not all; for Neill is ultimately bound to Smith for so much paid to his use at his request: and in every aspect the plaintiff is entitled to recover. -, Judgment affirmed.. MURDER--INDICTMENT. Under an indictment for murder, the jury may find the prisoner guilty of the lesser offence of manslaughter, either voluntary or involuntary, and the verdict will be legal, although there is no count for manslaughter1 in the indictment.--Reynolds v. The State of Georgia, 1 Kelly's R., p. 222. Ga. (1847.)...

R553

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles5530
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1852 edition. Excerpt: ... the agreement and intention of the parties.--6 Johns. Chan., 395; 4 Whart., 410; 8 Watts, 148; Pitman on Prin. and Surely, 40 Law Lib., 93. Here the assignment was made in pursuance of the original design of the parties, and was the consideration for the payment of the money. Per Curiam.--The plaintiflySmith, stands in the place of Neill, the mortgagee; and why shall he not have the same remedy? Because, says the defendant's counsel, the condition of the mortgage was to save harmless Neill, and not Smith, his assignee, who paid the original debt; and it consequently has not been broken. But the payment of the debt for which Neill was surety was in effect his payment, and not the payment of Smith, who furnished the money at his request, and on the security of the mortgage. Had Neill received this money in the first instance, raised as it was on the security of the mortgage, and paid it in extinction of the original debt with his own hand, there would not be a doubt that the contingency had happened to his disadvantage, against which the mortgage was a security; and it happened in effect, when Smith paid it with the consideration of the assignment. The money which constituted that consideration was Neill's money; and the payment was his. That is not all; for Neill is ultimately bound to Smith for so much paid to his use at his request: and in every aspect the plaintiff is entitled to recover. -, Judgment affirmed.. MURDER--INDICTMENT. Under an indictment for murder, the jury may find the prisoner guilty of the lesser offence of manslaughter, either voluntary or involuntary, and the verdict will be legal, although there is no count for manslaughter1 in the indictment.--Reynolds v. The State of Georgia, 1 Kelly's R., p. 222. Ga. (1847.)...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

June 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

June 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 8mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

148

ISBN-13

978-1-150-96559-3

Barcode

9781150965593

Categories

LSN

1-150-96559-2



Trending On Loot