Constructions of the Sudder Dewanee Adawlut; Lower and N. W. Provinces. Alphabetically Arranged. 1793 to 1856. Those Which Are Obsolete Are in an Appendix (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1856 edition. Excerpt: ...does not appear to be necessary; and to observe, that the enhanced cost attending the presentation of a petition after a lapse of three months, is merely with reference to such delay, and the probable inconveniences that may attend it; and the Court, to whom the petition for a review may be presented, is competent to reject it on any ground; it not being requisite, according to the rule contained in Clause 2, Sec. 4, Beg. 26, 1814, to admit a review, unless the parties preferring applications for the same, shall be able to show just and reasonable ground, to the satisfaction of the Court, for not having preferred such application within the limited period. Review; Regular suit; After Appeal; Cons. No. 1402, W. C. July 28, L. C. September 5, 1845, on Clause 2, Sec. 4, lieg. 26, 1814. After the admission of an Appeal from a judgment in a regular suit, no application for a review of that judgment can bo received by the Lower Court, whatever be the result of the appeal. The same rule will s ply in case of admission of a Special Appeal, although the admission and determination of such Appeal, are irrespective of the facts on which rests the judgment of the Lower Courts, and on which an application for review must be grounded.--(Vide No. 1057.) Reviews; Remands; Irregularity; Three Months; Cons. No. 1375, W. C. January 31, L. C. February REV 226 SAL 24, 1843, on Clause 1, Sec. 2, Reg. 2, 1825. Held, by a majority of the two C ourts, that a case, without trial of the merits, being remanded for irregularity, either party being desirous of a review of that order, after the expiration of three months, must move the Court by a petition, engrossed on a stamp of the value prescribed for petitions given after the period of three months by Clause I, ..

R1,046

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles10460
Mobicred@R98pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1856 edition. Excerpt: ...does not appear to be necessary; and to observe, that the enhanced cost attending the presentation of a petition after a lapse of three months, is merely with reference to such delay, and the probable inconveniences that may attend it; and the Court, to whom the petition for a review may be presented, is competent to reject it on any ground; it not being requisite, according to the rule contained in Clause 2, Sec. 4, Beg. 26, 1814, to admit a review, unless the parties preferring applications for the same, shall be able to show just and reasonable ground, to the satisfaction of the Court, for not having preferred such application within the limited period. Review; Regular suit; After Appeal; Cons. No. 1402, W. C. July 28, L. C. September 5, 1845, on Clause 2, Sec. 4, lieg. 26, 1814. After the admission of an Appeal from a judgment in a regular suit, no application for a review of that judgment can bo received by the Lower Court, whatever be the result of the appeal. The same rule will s ply in case of admission of a Special Appeal, although the admission and determination of such Appeal, are irrespective of the facts on which rests the judgment of the Lower Courts, and on which an application for review must be grounded.--(Vide No. 1057.) Reviews; Remands; Irregularity; Three Months; Cons. No. 1375, W. C. January 31, L. C. February REV 226 SAL 24, 1843, on Clause 1, Sec. 2, Reg. 2, 1825. Held, by a majority of the two C ourts, that a case, without trial of the merits, being remanded for irregularity, either party being desirous of a review of that order, after the expiration of three months, must move the Court by a petition, engrossed on a stamp of the value prescribed for petitions given after the period of three months by Clause I, ..

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

September 2013

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

September 2013

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 12mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

232

ISBN-13

978-1-230-17145-6

Barcode

9781230171456

Categories

LSN

1-230-17145-2



Trending On Loot