This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1906 Excerpt: ...Zeitschr.f. Augenh., Sept.-Okt, 1905. (9) Ramos.--On certain ocular symptoms of hysterical nature and their diagnostic value. (Algunos fenomenos oculares paradojicos de naturaleza histerica y su valor diagnostico.) Anales de Oftalmologia, Enero, 1906. (1) Bichelonne and others are of the opinion that concentric contraction of the visual field can be easily simulated by an adroit malingerer. Mahillon is convinced that records of the visual fields, and especially of the colcur fields, are of the greatest importance, and can hardly be simulated by the class of patient who claims compensation for injury. He urges the necessity of making the examinations as quickly as possible, as patients suffering from nervous affections are easily fatigued. A few minutes rest should also be given after the examination of each colour field. The author's observations show that uniform contraction of the visual field, accompanied by inversion of the colour fields, are frequently met with in hysteria, and almost always in traumatic hysteria. The order of magnitude of the fields is generally red, yellow, blue, green, violet. The red field is the largest, and is characteristic of this dyschromatopsia. Anomalies of the visual fields are not necessarily found in all cases of traumatic neurosis, nor can anomalous fields serve exclusively for the diagnosis of that affection. But along with other nervous symptoms, and the history, contraction of the visual fields, with inversion of the colour fields, are almost characteristic of traumatic hysteria. This variety of traumatic neurosis is serious, particularly when pronounced neurasthetic troubles are added. It is resistant to treatment, and calls for a guarded prognosis. J. Jameson Evans. (2) In April, 1903, the patient, a married woman, ...