The distortion of classical narrative techniques in modern film using the example of Vanilla Sky (Paperback)

Seminar paper from the year 2005 in the subject Communications - Movies and Television, grade: 1,3, University of Siegen (Forschungskolleg 615), course: Narration and Film, 10 entries in the bibliography, language: English, comment: Die Arbeit zeigt eine neue Art der Erzahlstruktur in Hollywoodfilmen der spaten neunziger und des neuen Jahrtausends. Hauptaugenmerke werden dabei auf diegetische Bruche, Zeitschienen, Raumreprasentation und Charakterprasentation gelegt. Neben Vanilla Sky werden auch Beispiele aus Fight Club, Memento, The Sixth Sense und Identity gebraucht., abstract: For a long time, most Hollywood directors stuck to a certain kind of narrative strategies to convey their view of the world to the recipient. Movie-conventions were therefore set from the beginning of profitable movie making and were fastened by the rise of big movie studios. In recent modern movies however, some directors have laid extreme interest on not sticking to the conventions and established a kind of non-narrative technique. As a result some of the most astonishing movies of the 90ies and the new millennium were created. The success of some of these movies can be explained by two facts. First of all, the abolishing of movie conventions resulted in the filmic reproduction of stories that had before been said to be unfit for filmic expression. Secondly the movies created drew their fascination from a non-understanding. With no classical movie conventions aligned, these movies seemed disturbing and frightening but it is also this disturbance that mesmerizes the viewer. In this essay I will try to outline in which way narrative conventions are abolished in modern productions and what effect this has on the spectator. To reduce the amount of information and to exemplify certain points I will stick to Cameron Crowe's movie Vanilla Sky (2001) which is based on the motion picture Arbre los Ojos (1997) by Alejandro Amenabar. The choice is justified by a rather confusing structure