Studies in Cancer and Allied Subjects Volume 1 (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: ...Fortbildung, 1906, iii, 211. Arb. a. d. Kbnigl. Inst. f. Exp. Therap., 1906, Heft i, 92. Zeitschrift f. Krebsforsch., 1907, v, 74. It had been previously recorded by Bashford' that mice which had rid themselves of a certain transplantable mammary carcinoma were more resistant to re-inoculation with this tumor than with Jensen's carcinoma. There was, therefore,2..". a degree of protection which is common, and a certain degree which is specific." But the common protection was, as Bashford, Murray, and Cramer3 indicated, conferred by the tumor not as tumor, but as mouse tissue, and Bashford, Murray, and Haaland4 could discover no evidence that carcinoma evolved more resistance to sarcoma than did normal tissue, although sarcoma protected to a high degree against carcinoma. They could not, therefore, subscribe to Ehrlich's belief that protection between carcinoma and sarcoma was mutual and of equal degree. Haaland,5 in earlier experiments, had seen that an unsuccessful inoculation with Jensen's tumor did not protect against the subsequent implantation of sarcoma, but Lewin,6 on the contrary, was convinced that there could exist in the rat conditions of resistance common to sarcoma and carcinoma. Rats unsuccessfully inoculated with sarcoma, or in which a carcinoma had undergone spontaneous absorption, had been, in his experience, refractory to both carcinoma and sarcoma. Michaelis, Fleischmann, and Pincussohn 7 found that mice unsuccessfully inoculated with Jensen's tumor were not resistant to a Berlin growth, and Gierke,8 that mice negative to the inoculation of a tumor were protected in an extraordinarily high degree against the same, and to a somewhat lower degree against different tumors. 1 British Med. Jour., 1906, ii, 209. Lancet, 1906, ii, 314. ...

R541

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles5410
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1913 Excerpt: ...Fortbildung, 1906, iii, 211. Arb. a. d. Kbnigl. Inst. f. Exp. Therap., 1906, Heft i, 92. Zeitschrift f. Krebsforsch., 1907, v, 74. It had been previously recorded by Bashford' that mice which had rid themselves of a certain transplantable mammary carcinoma were more resistant to re-inoculation with this tumor than with Jensen's carcinoma. There was, therefore,2..". a degree of protection which is common, and a certain degree which is specific." But the common protection was, as Bashford, Murray, and Cramer3 indicated, conferred by the tumor not as tumor, but as mouse tissue, and Bashford, Murray, and Haaland4 could discover no evidence that carcinoma evolved more resistance to sarcoma than did normal tissue, although sarcoma protected to a high degree against carcinoma. They could not, therefore, subscribe to Ehrlich's belief that protection between carcinoma and sarcoma was mutual and of equal degree. Haaland,5 in earlier experiments, had seen that an unsuccessful inoculation with Jensen's tumor did not protect against the subsequent implantation of sarcoma, but Lewin,6 on the contrary, was convinced that there could exist in the rat conditions of resistance common to sarcoma and carcinoma. Rats unsuccessfully inoculated with sarcoma, or in which a carcinoma had undergone spontaneous absorption, had been, in his experience, refractory to both carcinoma and sarcoma. Michaelis, Fleischmann, and Pincussohn 7 found that mice unsuccessfully inoculated with Jensen's tumor were not resistant to a Berlin growth, and Gierke,8 that mice negative to the inoculation of a tumor were protected in an extraordinarily high degree against the same, and to a somewhat lower degree against different tumors. 1 British Med. Jour., 1906, ii, 209. Lancet, 1906, ii, 314. ...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

March 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

March 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 6mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

112

ISBN-13

978-1-130-15359-0

Barcode

9781130153590

Categories

LSN

1-130-15359-2



Trending On Loot