Women in scientific careers - sixth report of session 2013-14, report with formal minutes (Paperback)


Some universities are doing a great job at improving working conditions for women scientists, but others are not. The system of short term contracts is hugely off-putting for many women scientists. More standardisation is required across the whole higher education sector and Government, universities and research councils should review the academic careers structure, so that talented women, and men, can have more stable career pathways. The Committee was also disappointed that BIS funding for the UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology (UKRC) was significantly cut during the 2010 Spending Review. While the Government recognises the importance of gender diversity in science, its efforts appear to be largely focused on recruiting girls to study STEM subjects rather than on supporting women to stay in science. It is commendable that the Government wants to inspire girls to choose science at school because this is when major decisions about future careers are made. However, such efforts are wasted if women scientists are then disproportionately and systematically disadvantaged compared to men. The Government now needs to monitor the effects of its decision to cut diversity funding and pay more attention to the retention of women in science. The Committee also called for diversity and equality training to be provided to all STEM university undergraduate and postgraduate students, line managers and members of recruitment and promotion panels.

Delivery AdviceNot available

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

Some universities are doing a great job at improving working conditions for women scientists, but others are not. The system of short term contracts is hugely off-putting for many women scientists. More standardisation is required across the whole higher education sector and Government, universities and research councils should review the academic careers structure, so that talented women, and men, can have more stable career pathways. The Committee was also disappointed that BIS funding for the UK Resource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology (UKRC) was significantly cut during the 2010 Spending Review. While the Government recognises the importance of gender diversity in science, its efforts appear to be largely focused on recruiting girls to study STEM subjects rather than on supporting women to stay in science. It is commendable that the Government wants to inspire girls to choose science at school because this is when major decisions about future careers are made. However, such efforts are wasted if women scientists are then disproportionately and systematically disadvantaged compared to men. The Government now needs to monitor the effects of its decision to cut diversity funding and pay more attention to the retention of women in science. The Committee also called for diversity and equality training to be provided to all STEM university undergraduate and postgraduate students, line managers and members of recruitment and promotion panels.

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Tso

Country of origin

United Kingdom

Series

House of Commons Papers, 2013-14 701

Release date

February 2014

Availability

We don't currently have any sources for this product. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

Authors

Contributors

Dimensions

300mm (L)

Format

Paperback

Pages

63

ISBN-13

978-0-215-06796-8

Barcode

9780215067968

Categories

LSN

0-215-06796-7



Trending On Loot