Capital Regulation and Banks' Financial Decisions (Paperback)


This paper develops a stochastic dynamic model to examine the impact of capital regulation on banks' financial decisions. In equilibrium, lending decisions, capital buffer, and the probability of bank failure are endogenously determined. Compared to a flat-rate capital rule, a risk-sensitive capital standard causes the capital requirement to be much higher for small (and riskier) banks and much lower for large (and less risky) banks. Nevertheless, changes in actual capital holdings are less pronounced due to the offsetting effect of capital buffers. Moreover, the nonbinding capital constraint in equilibrium implies that banks adopt an active portfolio strategy, and hence the countercyclical movement of risk-based capital requirements does not necessarily lead to a reinforcement of the credit cycle. In fact, the results from the calibrated model show that the impact on cyclical lending behavior differs substantially across banks. Lastly, the analysis suggests that the adoption of a more risk-sensitive capital regime can be welfare improving from a regulator's perspective, in that it causes less distortion in loan decisions and achieves a better balance between safety and efficiency.

R325
List Price R406
Save R81 20%

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles3250
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This paper develops a stochastic dynamic model to examine the impact of capital regulation on banks' financial decisions. In equilibrium, lending decisions, capital buffer, and the probability of bank failure are endogenously determined. Compared to a flat-rate capital rule, a risk-sensitive capital standard causes the capital requirement to be much higher for small (and riskier) banks and much lower for large (and less risky) banks. Nevertheless, changes in actual capital holdings are less pronounced due to the offsetting effect of capital buffers. Moreover, the nonbinding capital constraint in equilibrium implies that banks adopt an active portfolio strategy, and hence the countercyclical movement of risk-based capital requirements does not necessarily lead to a reinforcement of the credit cycle. In fact, the results from the calibrated model show that the impact on cyclical lending behavior differs substantially across banks. Lastly, the analysis suggests that the adoption of a more risk-sensitive capital regime can be welfare improving from a regulator's perspective, in that it causes less distortion in loan decisions and achieves a better balance between safety and efficiency.

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Bibliogov

Country of origin

United States

Release date

September 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

September 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 3mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

50

ISBN-13

978-1-249-56034-0

Barcode

9781249560340

Categories

LSN

1-249-56034-9



Trending On Loot