A Brief View of the Writ Ne Exeat Regno as an Equitable Process; With the Rules of Practice Relating to It (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1824. Excerpt: ... PART II. This Writ, when granted on behalf of a Subject, seems formerly to have been considered a Writ of Grace, and, as we are told, it " used to "be granted at the mere pleasure of the Court, "on affidavit, or, other matter, shewing the par"ty designed to go out of the Realm to the other "party's damage (1)." "It is said, however, to have been settled by "the Lord Keeper Wright, that it being a rec medial Writ, is, as such, upon due application "by petition, or, motion, to be granted the subject (2)." Conformably to this doctrine, the Court formerly granted the Writ, without any Bill hav (1) Practical Reg. (Ed. Wyatt) p. 289. Curs. Cane. 465. (2) Pract. Reg. (Ed Wyatt) 289. Curs. Cane. 455. ing been previously filed (3). But it is now, I apprehend, clearly settled, that this Writ ought not to issue, unless a Bill has been previously filed, or, in other words, there be an existing suit (4). As a preliminary observation, it should not be omitted, "that the writ cannot issue where the "Plaintiff is out of the jurisdiction. There is "(says Lord C. Eldari) no instance of it; and "great inconvenience would result from pre-" "venting a party returning home to settle the "account, on the application of a Plaintiff, who "may never come here. If an account is to be "taken, how is he to proceed against the Plain-tiff (5)?" (3) Lloyd e. Cardy, Free. Ch. 171. Anon. Ca. cited in ex-parte Bruncker, 3 P. Wins. 312; and see note K there. From a MS. note of Ex-parte Bruncker in my possession, the precedent of Lord Cowper's, referred to in that case, was Hendry qui tarn, Use. v. Richardson, in July, 1708, of which my MS. note of Ex-parte Bruncker makes Lord Talbot observe, "that the Crown and public revenue were there "concerned." See also Register's statement in Rod...

R362

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles3620
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1824. Excerpt: ... PART II. This Writ, when granted on behalf of a Subject, seems formerly to have been considered a Writ of Grace, and, as we are told, it " used to "be granted at the mere pleasure of the Court, "on affidavit, or, other matter, shewing the par"ty designed to go out of the Realm to the other "party's damage (1)." "It is said, however, to have been settled by "the Lord Keeper Wright, that it being a rec medial Writ, is, as such, upon due application "by petition, or, motion, to be granted the subject (2)." Conformably to this doctrine, the Court formerly granted the Writ, without any Bill hav (1) Practical Reg. (Ed. Wyatt) p. 289. Curs. Cane. 465. (2) Pract. Reg. (Ed Wyatt) 289. Curs. Cane. 455. ing been previously filed (3). But it is now, I apprehend, clearly settled, that this Writ ought not to issue, unless a Bill has been previously filed, or, in other words, there be an existing suit (4). As a preliminary observation, it should not be omitted, "that the writ cannot issue where the "Plaintiff is out of the jurisdiction. There is "(says Lord C. Eldari) no instance of it; and "great inconvenience would result from pre-" "venting a party returning home to settle the "account, on the application of a Plaintiff, who "may never come here. If an account is to be "taken, how is he to proceed against the Plain-tiff (5)?" (3) Lloyd e. Cardy, Free. Ch. 171. Anon. Ca. cited in ex-parte Bruncker, 3 P. Wins. 312; and see note K there. From a MS. note of Ex-parte Bruncker in my possession, the precedent of Lord Cowper's, referred to in that case, was Hendry qui tarn, Use. v. Richardson, in July, 1708, of which my MS. note of Ex-parte Bruncker makes Lord Talbot observe, "that the Crown and public revenue were there "concerned." See also Register's statement in Rod...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 1mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

24

ISBN-13

978-1-151-69096-8

Barcode

9781151690968

Categories

LSN

1-151-69096-1



Trending On Loot