Equitable Remedies Volume 5 (Paperback)

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1905 edition. Excerpt: ...to transfer the title, although they may be at the time in another state, unless the statutes or the local policy of that state forbid" Ward v. Connecticut Pipe Mfg. Co., 71 Conn. 345, 71 Am. St. Eep. 207, 41 Atl. 1057, 42 L. E. A. 706; Weller v. J. B. Pace Tobacco Co., 2 N. Y. Supp. 292, in which a foreign receiver was given preference over a subsequent domestic attaching creditor. 22 Lackmann v. Supreme Council (1904), 142 Cal. 22. 23 Gray v. Covert, 25 Ind. App. 561, 81 Am. St. Eep. 117, 58 N. E. 731; Ward v. Connecticut Pipe Mfg. Co., 71 Conn. 345, 71 Am. St. Eep. 207, 41 Atl. 1057, 42 L. E. A. 706; Barth v. Backus, 140 N. Y. 230, 37 Am. St. Eep. 545, 35 N. E. 425, 23 L. E. A. 47; Catlin v. Wilcox Silver Plate Co., 123 Ind. 477, 18 Am. St. Eep. 338, 24 N. E. 250, 8 L. E. A. 62; Thura v. Pingree, 21 Utah, 348, 61 Pac. 18; The Willamette Valley, 66 Fed. 565, 13 C. C. A. 635; Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Lacombe, 84 N. Y. 367, 38 Am. Eep. 518; Gilman v. Ketcham, 84 Wis. 60, 36 Am. St. Eep. 899, 54 N. W. 395, 23 L. E. A. 52; Choctaw Coal & M. Co. v. Williams-Echols Dry Goods Co. (Ark.), 87 S. W. 632; Gerding v. East Tenn. L. Co., 185 Mass. 380, 70 N. E. proceeding in which the receiver was appointed--in this case even though not a citizen of the state of appointment--and has attempted to gain a priority by attaching before the receiver could get possession, he will not only be adjudged guilty of a contempt by the court of appointment, but his attachments will not be allowed to prevail in the other jurisdiction.24 If no injunction had been issued, however, even though the attaching creditor was not only subject to the jurisdiction of the appointing court as a citizen or resident, but also had actual notice of the appointment of the receiver, ...