Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (Volume 4; V. 58) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1854. Excerpt: ... Hennessey r. Farrell & another & Trustees. retain the remaining twenty-five per cent until the work should be completed and accepted; and that when the whole section should be completed and accepted, according to contract, the balance due should be paid to the defendants. It appeared, also, that the defendants having failed in the performance of the contract on their part, the contractors determined that the same had been abandoned, according to the stipulation above mentioned. At the time of this determination, the defendants had completed one month's work, for which they had been paid, according to the contract, seventy-five per cent, amounting to $401.58. They had also worked a part of a second month, but the work had not been estimated by the engineer. Deducting one quarter from the amount of the second month's work, as stated by the supposed trustees, the balance in their hands for that month was $262.51. The quarter part of the whole work done by the defendants, together with the said balance of the second month's work, the supposed trustees contended, by their answers, was forfeited to them, on the ground, that " the defendants abandoned their work and failed to perform their contract." The cases came by appeal to this court, where they were argued in writing by F. Halt, for the plaintiffs, and J. C. B. Davis and S. B. I. Goddard, for the trustees. Shaw, C. J. A preliminary exception is taken by the plaintiffs in their argument, that three trustees are summoned, and one only has answered. In examining the case, it appears, that the plaintiff seeks to charge the three trustees on a joint liability from them to the principal defendants; that one has answered for himself and the other two, jointly, and stated the joint account. We think this is prima ...

R869

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles8690
Mobicred@R81pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1854. Excerpt: ... Hennessey r. Farrell & another & Trustees. retain the remaining twenty-five per cent until the work should be completed and accepted; and that when the whole section should be completed and accepted, according to contract, the balance due should be paid to the defendants. It appeared, also, that the defendants having failed in the performance of the contract on their part, the contractors determined that the same had been abandoned, according to the stipulation above mentioned. At the time of this determination, the defendants had completed one month's work, for which they had been paid, according to the contract, seventy-five per cent, amounting to $401.58. They had also worked a part of a second month, but the work had not been estimated by the engineer. Deducting one quarter from the amount of the second month's work, as stated by the supposed trustees, the balance in their hands for that month was $262.51. The quarter part of the whole work done by the defendants, together with the said balance of the second month's work, the supposed trustees contended, by their answers, was forfeited to them, on the ground, that " the defendants abandoned their work and failed to perform their contract." The cases came by appeal to this court, where they were argued in writing by F. Halt, for the plaintiffs, and J. C. B. Davis and S. B. I. Goddard, for the trustees. Shaw, C. J. A preliminary exception is taken by the plaintiffs in their argument, that three trustees are summoned, and one only has answered. In examining the case, it appears, that the plaintiff seeks to charge the three trustees on a joint liability from them to the principal defendants; that one has answered for himself and the other two, jointly, and stated the joint account. We think this is prima ...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 13mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

242

ISBN-13

978-1-235-63939-5

Barcode

9781235639395

Categories

LSN

1-235-63939-8



Trending On Loot