Cases Decided in the Inferior Courts of Record of the State of New York (Volume 35 ) (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1901 Excerpt: ... ditioned to secure the payment of the deht on demand. After the saloon had been surrendered to the landlord, Schwartz called upon him and said he wished to take the goods away. The testimony is conflicting as to whether Schwartz then notified the defendant that he made this demand as owner, or whether he exhibited his bill of sale. Eeldman, the mortgagee, subsequently took possession of so much as remained of the furniture and fixtures covered by his mortgage. This he had a right to do, and the plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment for their return or value. As to the two barrels of beer there is no evidence, and no presumption that they were in the saloon when the bill of sale was made on May thirty-first. If they were not, they did not pass to the plaintiff under the bill of sale. As the saloon had been in active business between May thirty-first and June nineteenth, there is no presumption that the beer, found there on June nineteenth, had been there nineteen days previous. As to the desk, which is all that remains, and apparently all that the appellant really thinks he is entitled to judgment for, the evidence is not satisfactory that the plaintiff made a proper demand upon defendant for it As it came into defendant's possession lawfully, being in the saloon when possession was surrendered by its apparent owner, a proper demand was necessary before an action for conversion would lie. Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgebald, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs. William J. Wiersbach, Respondent, v. Delephine Bloch & Sabwa Heidelmeineb, Appellants. Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of The Bronx. Nestor A. Alexander, for appellants. Gantz, Neier & McKennell, ..

R1,187

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles11870
Mobicred@R111pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1901 Excerpt: ... ditioned to secure the payment of the deht on demand. After the saloon had been surrendered to the landlord, Schwartz called upon him and said he wished to take the goods away. The testimony is conflicting as to whether Schwartz then notified the defendant that he made this demand as owner, or whether he exhibited his bill of sale. Eeldman, the mortgagee, subsequently took possession of so much as remained of the furniture and fixtures covered by his mortgage. This he had a right to do, and the plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment for their return or value. As to the two barrels of beer there is no evidence, and no presumption that they were in the saloon when the bill of sale was made on May thirty-first. If they were not, they did not pass to the plaintiff under the bill of sale. As the saloon had been in active business between May thirty-first and June nineteenth, there is no presumption that the beer, found there on June nineteenth, had been there nineteen days previous. As to the desk, which is all that remains, and apparently all that the appellant really thinks he is entitled to judgment for, the evidence is not satisfactory that the plaintiff made a proper demand upon defendant for it As it came into defendant's possession lawfully, being in the saloon when possession was surrendered by its apparent owner, a proper demand was necessary before an action for conversion would lie. Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgebald, JJ. Judgment affirmed, with costs. William J. Wiersbach, Respondent, v. Delephine Bloch & Sabwa Heidelmeineb, Appellants. Appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, second district, borough of The Bronx. Nestor A. Alexander, for appellants. Gantz, Neier & McKennell, ..

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 20mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

372

ISBN-13

978-1-235-78817-8

Barcode

9781235788178

Categories

LSN

1-235-78817-2



Trending On Loot