Reports of Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of North Carolina (Volume 2; V. 6); From the Year 1804 to the Year [1819] Inclusive (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1826. Excerpt: ... Jtot 1818. ladies of a tenant for life, will not affect the party. An v"'vw entry to avoid the statute must be an entry for the purHunt, .. pose of taking possession and such an entry cannot be Crowell. ma(le during the existence of a life estate 4. John, 40 . 1. Burr. 120, 126. 2. Salk. 432. 7. East, 311, 312, 319, 321. The Plaintiff had no right to enter before the death of Thomas Brown, and he died the 22d of Novcmber,4l814. By the Court--Judgment for the Plaintiff. Hunt-) v. . From Nash. Crowell. J It teem that an appeal may be taken from an interlocutory order of the County Court granting leave to amend; and that on confirming the judgment of the County Court, a procedendo will issue from the Superior Court. This was a suit commenced before a Justice of the Peace and came to the County Court by appeal. In the County Court the Defendant pleaded in abatement that the warrant was not made returnable within thirty days, Sundays excepted; whereupon Plaintiff moved for leave to amend by inserting in the warrant, the words, "within thirty days, Sundays excepted," which was granted by the Court. The Defendant thereupon, appealed to the Superior Court, where the Plaintiff objected that the appeal was improperly taken in a matter from the decision of which no appeal would lie. The case was referred to this Court, to say, whether the appeal was properly taken and could be sustained, or whether the Superior Court had no jurisdiction of the cause? And if the cause be remanded to the County Court, whether any, and what judgment shall be rendered in the Superior Court? Taylor Chief-Justice.--I am of opinion that the County Court did right in allowing the amendment of the warrant, and (hat the judgment thus pronounced by them J"" 1818. was so closely connected w...

R611

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles6110
Mobicred@R57pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1826. Excerpt: ... Jtot 1818. ladies of a tenant for life, will not affect the party. An v"'vw entry to avoid the statute must be an entry for the purHunt, .. pose of taking possession and such an entry cannot be Crowell. ma(le during the existence of a life estate 4. John, 40 . 1. Burr. 120, 126. 2. Salk. 432. 7. East, 311, 312, 319, 321. The Plaintiff had no right to enter before the death of Thomas Brown, and he died the 22d of Novcmber,4l814. By the Court--Judgment for the Plaintiff. Hunt-) v. . From Nash. Crowell. J It teem that an appeal may be taken from an interlocutory order of the County Court granting leave to amend; and that on confirming the judgment of the County Court, a procedendo will issue from the Superior Court. This was a suit commenced before a Justice of the Peace and came to the County Court by appeal. In the County Court the Defendant pleaded in abatement that the warrant was not made returnable within thirty days, Sundays excepted; whereupon Plaintiff moved for leave to amend by inserting in the warrant, the words, "within thirty days, Sundays excepted," which was granted by the Court. The Defendant thereupon, appealed to the Superior Court, where the Plaintiff objected that the appeal was improperly taken in a matter from the decision of which no appeal would lie. The case was referred to this Court, to say, whether the appeal was properly taken and could be sustained, or whether the Superior Court had no jurisdiction of the cause? And if the cause be remanded to the County Court, whether any, and what judgment shall be rendered in the Superior Court? Taylor Chief-Justice.--I am of opinion that the County Court did right in allowing the amendment of the warrant, and (hat the judgment thus pronounced by them J"" 1818. was so closely connected w...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

General Books LLC

Country of origin

United States

Release date

February 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

February 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 8mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

138

ISBN-13

978-1-150-15769-1

Barcode

9781150157691

Categories

LSN

1-150-15769-0



Trending On Loot