Reports of the High Court of Judicature, for the North-Western Provinces, 1866-1868 Volume 1 (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1907 edition. Excerpt: ...m. p. 32$, 4 Conferred on them the right to see or oust n ro-sharcr in default, and consequently the right alter ouster to deal with the holding of the defaulter as they please. In effect the lumberdars of mehal adaee are by the rooiikaree of settlement constituted as it were Zemindars with respect to the resumed maa/ee estate, and the co-sharcrs in the different puttees would seem to hold (heir shaves not direct from Government hut under the Ivmberdars of mehal adaee. It is clear that they do not fall within the terms of tiic last Clause of Section 2 of Act I. of 1P41: lor thern are none of them who as lumberdars have contracted with Government for the payment of the revenue on behalf of themselves and the other co-sharers. There is also the fact which appears to us to he decisive of this case, that the Government has no direct remedy against the co-sharers in the puttees if they fail to pay the revenue assessed, nor can it bring to sale thcr lands which it undoubtedly could do if these putteedaree estates were such as are described by the 2nd Section of Act I. of 1841. The cosharers not being directly responsible to Government but to the lumberdars of adaee, and those lumberdars being responsible to Government, it is against the latter and their rights and interests only that Government can proceed, and in the event of an auction sale being made for arrears, the rights of the co-sharers in the puttees would not be affected by it. We are, therefore, of opinion that the land in respect of which the plaintiff claims pre-emption is not a share of a futUedaree estate within the moaning of Section 2 of Act. of 1841, and it, therefore, follows that the right of preemption given by the Act cannot attach to it. The appeal is decreed, the decisions of...

R598

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles5980
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1907 edition. Excerpt: ...m. p. 32$, 4 Conferred on them the right to see or oust n ro-sharcr in default, and consequently the right alter ouster to deal with the holding of the defaulter as they please. In effect the lumberdars of mehal adaee are by the rooiikaree of settlement constituted as it were Zemindars with respect to the resumed maa/ee estate, and the co-sharcrs in the different puttees would seem to hold (heir shaves not direct from Government hut under the Ivmberdars of mehal adaee. It is clear that they do not fall within the terms of tiic last Clause of Section 2 of Act I. of 1P41: lor thern are none of them who as lumberdars have contracted with Government for the payment of the revenue on behalf of themselves and the other co-sharers. There is also the fact which appears to us to he decisive of this case, that the Government has no direct remedy against the co-sharers in the puttees if they fail to pay the revenue assessed, nor can it bring to sale thcr lands which it undoubtedly could do if these putteedaree estates were such as are described by the 2nd Section of Act I. of 1841. The cosharers not being directly responsible to Government but to the lumberdars of adaee, and those lumberdars being responsible to Government, it is against the latter and their rights and interests only that Government can proceed, and in the event of an auction sale being made for arrears, the rights of the co-sharers in the puttees would not be affected by it. We are, therefore, of opinion that the land in respect of which the plaintiff claims pre-emption is not a share of a futUedaree estate within the moaning of Section 2 of Act. of 1841, and it, therefore, follows that the right of preemption given by the Act cannot attach to it. The appeal is decreed, the decisions of...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

June 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

June 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 7mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

134

ISBN-13

978-1-236-53737-9

Barcode

9781236537379

Categories

LSN

1-236-53737-8



Trending On Loot