Proceedings of the Ohio State Pharmaceutical Association Volume 26; Annual Meeting (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1904 Excerpt: ...it will signify it by saying "aye," contrary "no." (The vote not being unanimous, a rising vote was called for, which resulted 23 ayes, 15 opposed, and the Chairman announced that the motion prevailed.) Mr. Arny: No. 4 is "The Recommendation that an extra fee be the penalty for neglect to re-register instead of forcing the pharmacist to another examination, is heartily indorsed, and we suggest that the Association consider the subject at this meeting." The first portion is before you, gentlemen, that a fine be the penalty for neglect to re-register, instead of a second examination. The President suggests that the fine be not put down as a fine, but that any person who neglects to re-register at the proper time can pay the fee usually demanded upon examination, either the single fee or double fee. The Chair: We will be glad to hear from you in regard to this. Mr. Beal: I would like to inquire how much the fine consists of. The fact of the matter is that laws of this kind can not be enforced in such a way as to recover an amount equivalent to the expense incurred. Our Pharmacy Board is very much limited with respect to finances, and I fear if this fine is adopted as a penalty a good many of the pharmacists throughout the State will merely laugh at it, and what are you going to do if you can't collect enough fines to pay the expenses and the attorney fees? I doubt whether it is the right thing to do. I have an idea that the second recommendation is right in the line of progress, but I am very doubtful about the last part. Mr. Hopp: I didn't put it in the nature of a flue, but that he pay equal to the fee of the original registration, or double. Mr. Beal: Suppose he doesn't register? Mr. Huston: Would it pay the Board to take that ...

R529

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles5290
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1904 Excerpt: ...it will signify it by saying "aye," contrary "no." (The vote not being unanimous, a rising vote was called for, which resulted 23 ayes, 15 opposed, and the Chairman announced that the motion prevailed.) Mr. Arny: No. 4 is "The Recommendation that an extra fee be the penalty for neglect to re-register instead of forcing the pharmacist to another examination, is heartily indorsed, and we suggest that the Association consider the subject at this meeting." The first portion is before you, gentlemen, that a fine be the penalty for neglect to re-register, instead of a second examination. The President suggests that the fine be not put down as a fine, but that any person who neglects to re-register at the proper time can pay the fee usually demanded upon examination, either the single fee or double fee. The Chair: We will be glad to hear from you in regard to this. Mr. Beal: I would like to inquire how much the fine consists of. The fact of the matter is that laws of this kind can not be enforced in such a way as to recover an amount equivalent to the expense incurred. Our Pharmacy Board is very much limited with respect to finances, and I fear if this fine is adopted as a penalty a good many of the pharmacists throughout the State will merely laugh at it, and what are you going to do if you can't collect enough fines to pay the expenses and the attorney fees? I doubt whether it is the right thing to do. I have an idea that the second recommendation is right in the line of progress, but I am very doubtful about the last part. Mr. Hopp: I didn't put it in the nature of a flue, but that he pay equal to the fee of the original registration, or double. Mr. Beal: Suppose he doesn't register? Mr. Huston: Would it pay the Board to take that ...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

March 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

March 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 4mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

82

ISBN-13

978-1-130-30063-5

Barcode

9781130300635

Categories

LSN

1-130-30063-3



Trending On Loot