The Removal of Causes from State to Federal Courts; With a Preliminary Chapter on Jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts of the United States (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1893 Excerpt: ... Reinemau v. Ball, 33 Fed. Rep. 632. 16 Western U. Tel. Co. V. Brown, 32 Fed. Rep. 337. 17 Laldly V. Huntington, 121U. S. 179. 18 Re San Antonio & A. F. R. Co., 41 Fed. Rep. 145. 19 Richmond etc. R. Co v Findley, 32 Fed. Rep. 64L 20 Ames v. Chicago etc. R. Co., 39 Fed. Rep 88L 96 t. Decisions under Act of 1875.--The controversy must be wholly between citizens of different States to give the right to remove.1 Congress did not intend to confer the right where a citizen of a S: ate other than that in which suit is brought is united with one who is a citizen of the latter State;2 so in a bill to foreclose a mortgage;3 or to redeem from a mortgage sale.4 So the purchaser of an equity of redemption cannot remove if mortgagor and mortgagee are citizens of the same State;5 and so where a judgment creditor intervenes.6 Where the suit embraces a single individual controversy, one party oannot remove if the other party consists of residents and nonresidents;7 so of a bill for a specific performance;8 or a bill to dissolve a corporation;9 or where the owner elects to bring an action for a conversion;10 or if, in the contest of a will, or in a suit to annul a will, necessary parties joined are residents and non-residents.11 If a stockholder disputes the rights of both claimants, and one is a citizen of another State, the case cannot be removed.12 A suit to recover land where the real parties are claimants, and damages are demanded of non-residents, cannot be removed.13 If substantial relief is asked against a party who is a citizen of the same State as plaintiff, the cause cannot be removed.14 Where non-residents sued out attachments, and these were followed by other attachments by resident creditors, the non-residents cannot remove the cause.15 Where less tha...

R699

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles6990
Mobicred@R66pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1893 Excerpt: ... Reinemau v. Ball, 33 Fed. Rep. 632. 16 Western U. Tel. Co. V. Brown, 32 Fed. Rep. 337. 17 Laldly V. Huntington, 121U. S. 179. 18 Re San Antonio & A. F. R. Co., 41 Fed. Rep. 145. 19 Richmond etc. R. Co v Findley, 32 Fed. Rep. 64L 20 Ames v. Chicago etc. R. Co., 39 Fed. Rep 88L 96 t. Decisions under Act of 1875.--The controversy must be wholly between citizens of different States to give the right to remove.1 Congress did not intend to confer the right where a citizen of a S: ate other than that in which suit is brought is united with one who is a citizen of the latter State;2 so in a bill to foreclose a mortgage;3 or to redeem from a mortgage sale.4 So the purchaser of an equity of redemption cannot remove if mortgagor and mortgagee are citizens of the same State;5 and so where a judgment creditor intervenes.6 Where the suit embraces a single individual controversy, one party oannot remove if the other party consists of residents and nonresidents;7 so of a bill for a specific performance;8 or a bill to dissolve a corporation;9 or where the owner elects to bring an action for a conversion;10 or if, in the contest of a will, or in a suit to annul a will, necessary parties joined are residents and non-residents.11 If a stockholder disputes the rights of both claimants, and one is a citizen of another State, the case cannot be removed.12 A suit to recover land where the real parties are claimants, and damages are demanded of non-residents, cannot be removed.13 If substantial relief is asked against a party who is a citizen of the same State as plaintiff, the cause cannot be removed.14 Where non-residents sued out attachments, and these were followed by other attachments by resident creditors, the non-residents cannot remove the cause.15 Where less tha...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

May 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

May 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 9mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

172

ISBN-13

978-1-150-40901-1

Barcode

9781150409011

Categories

LSN

1-150-40901-0



Trending On Loot