This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated.1867 Excerpt: ... METROPOLITICAL JURISDICTION. 35 the duty, to try my Suffragan. I said (Judgment, page 4), "If there were reason to think that jurisdiction in a legal sense was not conveyed by the formal instruments which profess to give it, --which is at least uncertain, inasmuch as no constitutional government had been established in Natal at the period of their issue, --there can be no doubt that the Church, after long and careful deliberation, resolved upon the appointment of Metropolitans over Colonial Churches, and sent me out in that capacity; or that the Crown co-operated with the Church in such proceeding, and gave its full sanction--of whatever value that sanction may be--both to the establishment of the office, and to the appointment of the individual who holds it; or that the Bishop recognized both the office and the jurisdiction, and elected the Metropolitan as his judge, in accepting his Letters Patent; or that he bound himself by a solemn oath to render due obedience to the See of Capetown, and the Bishop thereof; or that he has repeatedly, throughout his episcopate, as has been proved by the documents put in at the commencement of this trial--even on a charge of supposed heresy preferred against him some time ago, by two of his own Clergy--submitted to the judgment of his Metropolitan; or that, in the letter which he has requested may be considered as his defence, he has acknowledged that he stands in the relation of a Suffragan Bishop to the Metropolitan of this Province, of which he admits me to be the Metropolitan, with the powers and authority of that office." Next as to the Sentence. I should not myself have drawn up the sentence in the form in which it appears. I employed J egal advisers to do so, in consequence of the language of the Judicial Committee ...