This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1920 edition. Excerpt: ...Improper84 and 2. See authorities cited, supra, i 03 7f. 27 Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Shirley, 111 IT. S. 358, 28 L. ed. 455; Fletcher v. Hamlet, 116 U. 8. 408, 29 L. ed. 679; Chicago, E. I. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Martin, 178 U. 8. 245, 44 L. ed. 1055; Arkansas Val. 8m. Co. v. Cowcnhoven, 41 Fed. 450; Thompson v. Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. Co., 60 Fed. 773; Yarnell v. Felton, 102 Fed. 369; Huntington v. Pinney, 126 Fed. 237; Blackburn v. Blackburn, 142 Fed. 901; International & G. N. R. Co. v. Hoyle, C. C. A., 149 Fed. 180. Contra, Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Champlin (S. D. N. Y.), 21 Fed. 85; Garner v. Second Nat. Bank of Providence (S. D. N. Y.), 60 Fed. 369; Boston 8. D. & Tr. Co. v. Mackay (8. D. N. Y.), 70 Fed. 801; Hunter v. Conrad (D. R. I.), 85 Fed. 803; Mumford Rubber Tire Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. (8. D. N. Y.), 130 Fed. 496. 28 Brown v. Trousdale, 138 IT. 8. 389, 11 Sup. Ct. 308, 34 L. ed. 987; Patchin v. Hunter, 38 Fed. 51. Contra, Wormser v. Dahlman, Fed. Cas. Under the Judiciary Act of 1875, it was held that the exception of suits by assignees, which could not have been there instituted by the assignors, from the original jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts. of the United States, did not affect the right of removal; and that the right of a defendant to remove was not affected by the citizenship of his assignor.41 Where, by the State practice, the assignee of a cause of action sued in 372; Cudahy v. McGeoch, 37 Fed. 1; Walker v. O'Neill, 38 Fed. 374; Eddy v. Casas, 118 Fed. 363. 40 Martin v. Snyder, 148 XT. S. 663, 37 L. ed. 602; Wichita National Bank v. Smith, C. C. A., 72 Fed. 568. It has been held that, where there were several defendants, all of whom were citizens of a different State from the plaintiff, and...