A Treatise on Federal Practice, Civil and Criminal, Including Practice in Bankruptcy, Admiralty, Patent Cases, Foreclosure of Railway Mortgages, Suits Upon Claims Against the United States; Proceedings Before the Interstate Volume 3 (Paperback)


This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1920 edition. Excerpt: ...Improper84 and 2. See authorities cited, supra, i 03 7f. 27 Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Shirley, 111 IT. S. 358, 28 L. ed. 455; Fletcher v. Hamlet, 116 U. 8. 408, 29 L. ed. 679; Chicago, E. I. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Martin, 178 U. 8. 245, 44 L. ed. 1055; Arkansas Val. 8m. Co. v. Cowcnhoven, 41 Fed. 450; Thompson v. Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. Co., 60 Fed. 773; Yarnell v. Felton, 102 Fed. 369; Huntington v. Pinney, 126 Fed. 237; Blackburn v. Blackburn, 142 Fed. 901; International & G. N. R. Co. v. Hoyle, C. C. A., 149 Fed. 180. Contra, Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Champlin (S. D. N. Y.), 21 Fed. 85; Garner v. Second Nat. Bank of Providence (S. D. N. Y.), 60 Fed. 369; Boston 8. D. & Tr. Co. v. Mackay (8. D. N. Y.), 70 Fed. 801; Hunter v. Conrad (D. R. I.), 85 Fed. 803; Mumford Rubber Tire Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. (8. D. N. Y.), 130 Fed. 496. 28 Brown v. Trousdale, 138 IT. 8. 389, 11 Sup. Ct. 308, 34 L. ed. 987; Patchin v. Hunter, 38 Fed. 51. Contra, Wormser v. Dahlman, Fed. Cas. Under the Judiciary Act of 1875, it was held that the exception of suits by assignees, which could not have been there instituted by the assignors, from the original jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts. of the United States, did not affect the right of removal; and that the right of a defendant to remove was not affected by the citizenship of his assignor.41 Where, by the State practice, the assignee of a cause of action sued in 372; Cudahy v. McGeoch, 37 Fed. 1; Walker v. O'Neill, 38 Fed. 374; Eddy v. Casas, 118 Fed. 363. 40 Martin v. Snyder, 148 XT. S. 663, 37 L. ed. 602; Wichita National Bank v. Smith, C. C. A., 72 Fed. 568. It has been held that, where there were several defendants, all of whom were citizens of a different State from the plaintiff, and...

R1,628

Or split into 4x interest-free payments of 25% on orders over R50
Learn more

Discovery Miles16280
Mobicred@R153pm x 12* Mobicred Info
Free Delivery
Delivery AdviceOut of stock

Toggle WishListAdd to wish list
Review this Item

Product Description

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1920 edition. Excerpt: ...Improper84 and 2. See authorities cited, supra, i 03 7f. 27 Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Shirley, 111 IT. S. 358, 28 L. ed. 455; Fletcher v. Hamlet, 116 U. 8. 408, 29 L. ed. 679; Chicago, E. I. & Pac. Ry. Co. v. Martin, 178 U. 8. 245, 44 L. ed. 1055; Arkansas Val. 8m. Co. v. Cowcnhoven, 41 Fed. 450; Thompson v. Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. Co., 60 Fed. 773; Yarnell v. Felton, 102 Fed. 369; Huntington v. Pinney, 126 Fed. 237; Blackburn v. Blackburn, 142 Fed. 901; International & G. N. R. Co. v. Hoyle, C. C. A., 149 Fed. 180. Contra, Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Champlin (S. D. N. Y.), 21 Fed. 85; Garner v. Second Nat. Bank of Providence (S. D. N. Y.), 60 Fed. 369; Boston 8. D. & Tr. Co. v. Mackay (8. D. N. Y.), 70 Fed. 801; Hunter v. Conrad (D. R. I.), 85 Fed. 803; Mumford Rubber Tire Co. v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. (8. D. N. Y.), 130 Fed. 496. 28 Brown v. Trousdale, 138 IT. 8. 389, 11 Sup. Ct. 308, 34 L. ed. 987; Patchin v. Hunter, 38 Fed. 51. Contra, Wormser v. Dahlman, Fed. Cas. Under the Judiciary Act of 1875, it was held that the exception of suits by assignees, which could not have been there instituted by the assignors, from the original jurisdiction of the Circuit Courts. of the United States, did not affect the right of removal; and that the right of a defendant to remove was not affected by the citizenship of his assignor.41 Where, by the State practice, the assignee of a cause of action sued in 372; Cudahy v. McGeoch, 37 Fed. 1; Walker v. O'Neill, 38 Fed. 374; Eddy v. Casas, 118 Fed. 363. 40 Martin v. Snyder, 148 XT. S. 663, 37 L. ed. 602; Wichita National Bank v. Smith, C. C. A., 72 Fed. 568. It has been held that, where there were several defendants, all of whom were citizens of a different State from the plaintiff, and...

Customer Reviews

No reviews or ratings yet - be the first to create one!

Product Details

General

Imprint

Rarebooksclub.com

Country of origin

United States

Release date

June 2012

Availability

Supplier out of stock. If you add this item to your wish list we will let you know when it becomes available.

First published

June 2012

Authors

Dimensions

246 x 189 x 28mm (L x W x T)

Format

Paperback - Trade

Pages

554

ISBN-13

978-1-130-22987-5

Barcode

9781130229875

Categories

LSN

1-130-22987-4



Trending On Loot