This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1903 Excerpt: ...is vested in the school trustees or other designated officers.1 1. McLoud v. Selby, 1o Conn. 39o, 27 Am. Dec. 689; Kenyon v. Clarke, 2 R. I. 67; Gaskill v. Dudley, 6 Met. (Mass.) 546, 39 Am. Dec. 75o, where it was further said that the property of an individual may be so taken in the first instance, even if there is corporate property of the district which can be taken and applied towards satisfaction of such execution. 2. Gaskill v. Dudley, 6 Met. (Mass.) 546, 39 Am. Dec. 75o: Miller v. East School Dist., 26 Conn. 521. 3. Dissolution and Abolition of Districts.--Whitney v. Stow, 1 1 i Mass. 368; Rawson v. Spencer, 113 Mass. 4o; School-Dist. No. 16 v. Concord, 64 N. H. 235. Statute Abolishing School Districts and Constituting Each Town a Single District.--Conover v. Parker, 57 N. J. L. 631; Barre v. School Dist. No. 13, 67 Vt. 1o8; Dodge v. South Royalton Graded School Dist., 67 Vt. 334. See also Lathrop v. Sunderland, 64 Vt. 35. Compare State v. Barrett, 31 N. J. L. 31; State v. Jacobus, 26 N. J. L. 135. Power to Abolish Districts Within Township Vested in Township or Township Trustees.--Young v. Bethany, 73 Conn. 166: State v. Wilson, 149 Ind. 253; Tufts v. State. 119 Ind. 232; State v. Sherman, 9o Ind. 123; Mendell v. Marion, 16 Gray (Mass.) 353; Child v. Colburn, 54 N. H. 71. Power Vested in School Inspectors with Consent of Majority of Resident Taxpayers.--Briggs v. Borden, 71 Mich. 87. Com pare School Dist. No. Thirteen v. Dean, 17 Mich. 223; People v. Davidson, 2 Dougl. (Mich.) 121. Making Dissolution of District Dependent upon Will of Voters Held Constitutional.--State v. Cooley, 65 Minn. 4o6. Power to Abolish Independent Districts Vested in Courts.---In re Lagrange Independent School Dist., 7 Pa. Dist. 719; In re Braintrim Independent School Dist., ..